Skip to main content
S 3318Curriculum and Standards

Education - Curriculum

This bill gives Rhode Island schools an extra year, until June 2027, to select science and technology curriculums.

Introduced
Population
Affected
35
Email Legislator
Introduced May 22, 2026Committee Senate Education

Plain-English Summary

This bill gives public school districts, charter schools, and other local education agencies in Rhode Island an extra year to choose their science and technology curriculum. Previously, they had to select a high-quality curriculum and materials approved by the state by June 30, 2026. This legislation extends that deadline to June 30, 2027.

For younger readers

This bill changes the due date for schools in Rhode Island to pick the books and lessons they will use to teach science and technology. Before, schools had to decide by June 2026. Now, they have one more year to make their choice, so their new due date is June 2027.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Public school studentsScience and technology teachersSchool administratorsLocal education agenciesCurriculum publishers
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely. The bill simply extends a deadline for local education agencies to adopt state-approved public school curricula. It does not implicate free speech, due process, or unreasonable searches and seizures.

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Gives underfunded or struggling school districts more time to carefully evaluate and select culturally responsive science materials without rushing due to resource constraints.
  • Prevents schools from facing immediate penalties or financial strain if they were struggling to meet the original 2026 deadline to implement new materials.
  • Ensures that the curriculum chosen can be thoroughly vetted to align with the needs of diverse student populations by providing a longer selection window.
  • Delays the implementation of high-quality, updated science and technology curricula for students, potentially leaving them with outdated materials for another year.
  • Disproportionately harms students in lower-income districts who might rely the most on the state mandating newer, higher-quality educational standards.
  • Postpones the integration of culturally and linguistically responsive science practices that the updated curricula are required to support.
For Conservatives
  • Reduces the immediate regulatory burden on local school districts by delaying a state-mandated curriculum deadline.
  • Gives local education agencies and communities more time to review the proposed science curricula, ensuring it aligns with local values before implementation.
  • Defers the financial costs associated with purchasing new curriculum materials and training teachers, providing temporary relief to local municipal budgets.
  • The bill only delays the mandate rather than eliminating the state's centralized control over local school district curriculum choices.
  • Leaves intact the requirement that curricula must be "culturally and linguistically responsive," verbiage often opposed by conservatives as prioritizing progressive social agendas over traditional academics.
  • Maintains the state's authority to dictate science and technology standards, limiting the ultimate freedom of local municipalities to control their own schools.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 2 additions · 1 deletion

SECTION 1. Section 16-22-32 of the General Laws in Chapter 16-22 entitled "Curriculum [See Title 16 Chapter 97 — the Rhode Island Board of Education Act]" is hereby amended to read as follows: 16-22-32. High quality curriculum and materials. (a)(1) The council on elementary and secondary education (the “council”) shall direct the commissioner of elementary and secondary education (the “commissioner”) to institute a process for reviewing and identifying curriculum and materials for mathematics, English language arts, and science and technology that meet the following requirements:

(i) Is aligned with the academic standards provided in § 16-22-30;

(ii) Is aligned with the curriculum frameworks provided in § 16-22-31;

(iii) Is aligned with the RICAS, or any other test that is adopted as a statewide standardized test; and

(iv) Is of high quality.

(2) The commissioner shall identify at least five (5) examples each of curricula for mathematics and English language arts pursuant to this section by no later than January 1, 2021, for science and technology pursuant to this section by no later than January 31, 2026, and again as required by the council’s procedures set forth in subsection (a)(8) of this section. Once identified, the curricula shall be made available to the public, subject to copyright considerations.

(3) The commissioner shall direct all local education agencies (“LEAs”) to select one of the identified high-quality curricula and materials by the time of their next adoption cycle, but in any case, no later than June 30, 2023, for mathematics and English language arts, and no later than June 30, 2026 2027, for science and technology. LEAs shall select curriculum and materials that are responsive to the LEA’s cultural and linguistic needs, and support culturally responsive practices. LEAs shall implement the high-quality curricula and materials at the start of the school year that immediately follows the selection. If an LEA is unable to implement the high-quality curricula and materials fully due to financial hardship, the commissioner may grant the LEA an extension of time, provided that the LEA demonstrates continued efforts to complete the implementation.

(4) The commissioner shall institute a waiver process for LEAs that would like to use a curriculum other than any identified by the commissioner pursuant to this section. Part of that process may include, but is not limited to, asking the LEA to:

(i) Develop local curriculum goals;

(ii) Communicate the rationale for selecting the proposed curriculum over any of the curricula identified by the commissioner; and

(iii) Engage a third-party reviewer that has a proven track record of curriculum audits to review the proposed curriculum to ensure it aligns with state standards, establishes the scope and sequence of instruction, is of high quality, is culturally relevant, and to discuss any other strengths and weaknesses.

(5) Waiver determinations made pursuant to subsection (a)(4) of this section shall be appealable to the board of education.

(6) Any LEA that has at least seventy-five percent (75%) of its students meeting expectations on state assessments and also has no student subgroup identified for targeted assistance under Rhode Island’s accountability process may select and use curricula and materials other than any identified by the commissioner pursuant to this section for that subject area, only; provided, however, that if the LEA no longer has at least seventy-five percent (75%) of its students meeting expectations on state assessments, or if any student subgroup is identified for targeted assistance under Rhode Island’s accountability process, the LEA must select and implement one of the curricula identified by the commissioner pursuant to this section.

(7) LEAs shall develop and execute a curriculum implementation plan that includes professional development to ensure that all teachers and administrators are prepared to implement the new curriculum with the necessary skill and knowledge.

(8) The council shall develop procedures for updating the identification of curricula and materials pursuant to this section by no later than September 1, 2021. The procedures shall include a requirement that the council review and evaluate the identified curricula and materials regularly to ensure that the high quality of the curricula and materials is maintained. The review cycle shall begin in 2025, with subsequent reviews taking place in 2029, 2033, and every four (4) years thereafter.

(b) On or before December 1, 2020, and annually thereafter on or before December 1, the commissioner shall report to the governor, president of the senate, and the speaker of the house, regarding the progress toward fulfilling the requirements of this section, including, but not limited to, the high-quality curricula and materials identified, selected, and implemented by LEAs pursuant to this section.

(c) The state shall establish a professional development fund to provide professional learning to LEAs that elect to use prioritized curricula and materials in mathematics and English language arts as identified by the commissioner.

(d) For the purposes of this section, “local education agencies” (“LEAs”) shall include all of the following within the state of Rhode Island:

(1) Public school districts;

(2) Regional school districts;

(3) State-operated schools;

(4) Regional collaborative schools; and

(5) Charter schools.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.