Skip to main content
S 3077School Safety

Relating Education - The Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act

This bill mandates that smaller schools have one police officer and larger schools have two to qualify for state funding.

Introduced33 Yea4 Nay1 Not voting
Population
Affected
35
Email Legislator
Introduced Mar 13, 2026Committee Senate Education

Plain-English Summary

This legislation updates the Rhode Island Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act to establish specific staffing requirements for School Resource Officers (SROs) in public schools. Under this bill, schools seeking state reimbursement for SRO costs must adhere to a strict ratio based on student population: schools with fewer than 1,200 students are required to have one SRO, while schools with 1,200 or more students must have two. The state will continue to reimburse municipalities for half of the salary and benefit costs for these qualifying positions, provided these specific staffing criteria are met.

For younger readers

This law changes the rules for how schools get money from the state to pay for police officers, who are called School Resource Officers. The new rule says that the number of officers a school needs depends on how many students go there. If a school has a lot of students (1,200 or more), it needs to have two officers. If the school is smaller, it needs one officer. If schools follow these numbers, the state will help pay for half of the cost to hire these officers to help keep the school safe.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
StudentsSchool Resource OfficersSchool AdministratorsLocal Police DepartmentsTaxpayers
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Promotes equity by standardizing safety resources across districts, ensuring that schools with larger populations receive proportional state support regardless of the local tax base.
  • Maintains the requirement for School Resource Officers to be trained in community-oriented policing, which encourages relationship-building rather than purely punitive enforcement within schools.
  • Provides state financial aid to municipalities for these positions, which relieves pressure on local budgets and could potentially allow local funds to be redirected toward other social services.
  • Increases the presence of law enforcement in schools, which critics argue contributes to the school-to-prison pipeline and disproportionately targets minority and disabled students.
  • Prioritizes funding for policing over mental health professionals, social workers, and guidance counselors, failing to address the root causes of student behavioral issues.
  • Imposes a rigid, one-size-fits-all mandate for police staffing that overrides local community control and decision-making regarding what makes their specific school environment feel safe.
For Conservatives
  • Enhances school security by mandating specific police presence, ensuring that larger schools have adequate personnel to respond to threats and maintain law and order.
  • Supports law enforcement agencies by providing state-guaranteed funding for officer positions, ensuring police departments have the resources to operate effectively within the community.
  • Creates clear, objective standards for staffing based on enrollment numbers, reducing ambiguity and ensuring a baseline of protection for students and staff.
  • Imposes a state-level mandate on local school districts, stripping them of the autonomy to decide their own security needs and staffing levels based on local preferences.
  • Increases government spending by locking the state into reimbursing expanded police staffing levels, potentially leading to higher taxes to sustain these recurring costs.
  • Interferes with the free market of labor and municipal management by dictating specific hiring quotas for public sector employees within schools.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 7 additions

SECTION 1. Section 16-7.2-6 of the General Laws in Chapter 16-7.2 entitled "The Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act" is hereby amended to read as follows: 16-7.2-6. Categorical programs, state funded expenses. In addition to the foundation education aid provided pursuant to § 16-7.2-3, the permanent foundation education-aid program shall provide direct state funding for:

(a) Excess costs associated with special education students. Excess costs are defined when an individual special education student’s cost shall be deemed to be “extraordinary.” Extraordinary costs are those educational costs that exceed the state-approved threshold based on an amount above four times the core foundation amount (total of core instruction amount plus student success amount). The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding appropriated in any fiscal year; and the department of elementary and secondary education shall also collect data on those educational costs that exceed the state-approved threshold based on an amount above two (2), three (3), and five (5) times the core foundation amount;

(b) Career and technical education costs to help meet initial investment requirements needed to transform existing, or create new, comprehensive, career and technical education programs and career pathways in critical and emerging industries and to help offset the higher- than-average costs associated with facilities, equipment maintenance and repair, and supplies necessary for maintaining the quality of highly specialized programs that are a priority for the state. The department shall develop criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all career and technical education funds as may be determined by the general assembly on an annual basis. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(c) Programs to increase access to voluntary, free, high-quality pre-kindergarten programs for three (3) and four (4) year-old children, including the state pre-kindergarten program model developed pursuant to chapter 87 of this title and the federal Head Start Program 42 U.S.C. § 9801 et seq. The department shall work with the department of human services’ childcare office and Head Start collaboration office to recommend criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all early childhood categorical program funds as may be determined by the general assembly;

(d) Central Falls, Davies, and the Met Center Stabilization Fund is established to ensure that appropriate funding is available to support their students. Additional support for Central Falls is needed due to concerns regarding the city’s capacity to meet the local share of education costs. This fund requires that education aid calculated pursuant to § 16-7.2-3 and funding for costs outside the permanent foundation education-aid formula, including, but not limited to, transportation, facility maintenance, and retiree health benefits shall be shared between the state and the city of Central Falls. The fund shall be annually reviewed to determine the amount of the state and city appropriation. The state’s share of this fund may be supported through a reallocation of current state appropriations to the Central Falls school district. At the end of the transition period defined in § 16-7.2-7, the municipality will continue its contribution pursuant to § 16-7-24. Additional support for the Davies and the Met Center is needed due to the costs associated with running a stand-alone high school offering both academic and career and technical coursework. The department shall recommend criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all stabilization funds as may be determined by the general assembly;

(e) Excess costs associated with transporting students to out-of-district non-public schools. This fund will provide state funding for the costs associated with transporting students to out-of- district non-public schools, pursuant to chapter 21.1 of this title. The state will assume the costs of non-public out-of-district transportation for those districts participating in the statewide system. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(f) Excess costs associated with transporting students within regional school districts. This fund will provide direct state funding for the excess costs associated with transporting students within regional school districts, established pursuant to chapter 3 of this title. This fund requires that the state and regional school district share equally the student transportation costs net any federal sources of revenue for these expenditures. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(g) Public school districts that are regionalized shall be eligible for a regionalization bonus as set forth below:

(1) As used herein, the term “regionalized” shall be deemed to refer to a regional school district established under the provisions of chapter 3 of this title, including the Chariho Regional School district;

(2) For those districts that are regionalized as of July 1, 2010, the regionalization bonus shall commence in FY 2012. For those districts that regionalize after July 1, 2010, the regionalization bonus shall commence in the first fiscal year following the establishment of a regionalized school district as set forth in chapter 3 of this title, including the Chariho Regional School District;

(3) The regionalization bonus in the first fiscal year shall be two percent (2.0%) of the state’s share of the foundation education aid for the regionalized district as calculated pursuant to §§ 16-7.2-3 and 16-7.2-4 in that fiscal year;

(4) The regionalization bonus in the second fiscal year shall be one percent (1.0%) of the state’s share of the foundation education aid for the regionalized district as calculated pursuant to §§ 16-7.2-3 and 16-7.2-4 in that fiscal year;

(5) The regionalization bonus shall cease in the third fiscal year;

(6) The regionalization bonus for the Chariho regional school district shall be applied to the state share of the permanent foundation education aid for the member towns; and

(7) The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible regionalized school districts if the total, approved costs for which regionalized school districts are seeking a regionalization bonus exceed the amount of funding appropriated in any fiscal year;

(h) [Deleted by P.L. 2024, ch. 117, art. 8, § 1.]

(i) State support for school resource officers. For purposes of this subsection, a school resource officer (SRO) shall be defined as a career law enforcement officer with sworn authority who is deployed by an employing police department or agency in a community-oriented policing assignment to work in collaboration with one or more schools. School resource officers should have completed at least forty (40) hours of specialized training in school policing, administered by an accredited agency, before being assigned. Beginning in FY 2019, for a period of three (3) years, school districts or municipalities that choose to employ school resource officers shall receive direct state support for costs associated with employing such officers at public middle and high schools. Districts or municipalities shall be reimbursed an amount equal to one-half (½) of the cost of salaries and benefits for the qualifying positions. Funding will be provided for school resource officer positions established on or after July 1, 2018, provided that:

(1) Each school resource officer shall be assigned to one school:

(i) Schools with enrollments below one thousand two hundred (1,200) students shall require one school resource officer;

(ii) Schools with enrollments of one thousand two hundred (1,200) or more students shall require two school resource officers;

(2) School resource officers hired in excess of the requirement noted above shall not be eligible for reimbursement; and

(3) Schools that eliminate existing school resource officer positions and create new positions under this provision shall not be eligible for reimbursement; and

(j) Categorical programs defined in subsections (a) through (g) shall be funded pursuant to the transition plan in § 16-7.2-7.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.