Skip to main content
S 2687Health Insurance

Insurance - The Protect Mental Health Act

This bill requires health insurers to cover mental health and addiction treatment with the same level of access as physical healthcare.

Held for study
Population
Affected
72
Introduced Feb 27, 2026Committee Senate Health & Human Services

Plain-English Summary

The "Protect Mental Health Act" mandates that health insurance companies in Rhode Island provide coverage for mental health and substance use disorders that is comparable to their coverage for medical and surgical conditions. It requires insurers to analyze data to ensure they are not imposing stricter limitations—such as network restrictions or administrative hurdles—on mental health care than on physical health care. If data reveals significant disparities in access to care, insurers must take corrective action. The bill also defines "meaningful benefits" to ensure essential treatments are covered across various benefit classifications.

For younger readers

This law makes sure that health insurance companies treat doctors for your feelings and brain (mental health) the same way they treat doctors for your body (like fixing a broken arm). Sometimes, insurance companies make it harder or more expensive to see a mental health doctor or get help for addiction. This law says they have to play fair. They have to prove they are treating both kinds of doctors equally so people can get the help they need without extra trouble or unfair rules.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Health Insurance CompaniesPatients with Mental Health ConditionsPatients with Substance Use DisordersHealthcare ProvidersState Insurance Regulators
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Significantly strengthens enforcement of mental health parity laws, ensuring that individuals seeking help for mental illness or substance use disorders are not discriminated against by insurance companies compared to those seeking physical medical care.
  • Mandates that insurers provide "meaningful benefits" for core treatments, potentially expanding access to necessary therapy and addiction recovery services for vulnerable populations who rely on these safeguards.
  • Requires insurers to collect and analyze data regarding access to care, creating a mechanism for accountability that exposes systemic barriers and requires corrective action when disparities are found.
  • Continues to rely on the private insurance market structure rather than establishing a universal, single-payer system, meaning coverage remains tied to employment or ability to pay premiums.
  • The enforcement mechanism relies partially on insurers self-reporting data and responding to commissioner requests, which could lead to delays or bureaucratic stalling rather than immediate relief for patients in crisis.
  • While it mandates parity, it does not necessarily cap costs or premiums, meaning insurers could potentially raise rates for all plans to cover the increased compliance and benefit costs.
For Conservatives
  • Addresses the root causes of substance abuse and mental health crises, which could arguably lead to improved public safety and social stability in communities.
  • Establishes clear metrics and data requirements based on federal standards, creating a defined framework for compliance rather than vague, subjective regulatory mandates.
  • Ensures that consumers receive the specific insurance product benefits they have paid for by contract, upholding the principle of contract integrity between the insurer and the insured.
  • Imposes significant new regulatory burdens and reporting requirements on private insurance companies, interfering with the free market and their ability to structure plans efficiently.
  • Likely to increase insurance premiums for all policyholders as insurers pass on the administrative costs of data collection and the expense of expanded mandatory coverage.
  • Tethers state law to specific federal regulations (89 Fed. Reg. 77586), effectively surrendering state sovereignty over insurance regulation to federal bureaucrats.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 58 additions

SECTION 1. Title 27 of the General Laws entitled "INSURANCE" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: 27-38.3-1. Parity compliance and meaningful coverage.

(a) If a health plan provides coverage for mental health and substance use disorder services, any cost-sharing requirements for mental health and substance use disorder services and any treatment limitations, including quantitative treatment limitations and nonquantitative treatment limitations, related to mental health and substance use disorder services shall comply with the requirements in the provisions of Requirements Related to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, 89 Fed. Reg. 77586 (Sept. 23, 2024). (b)(1) Each health insurer shall collect and evaluate relevant data, in connection with its comparative analyses, in a manner reasonably designed to assess, for each nonquantitative treatment limitation and within each classification of benefits, the impact of the nonquantitative treatment limitation on relevant outcomes related to access to mental health benefits and substance use disorder benefits as compared to medical and surgical benefits. With respect to nonquantitative treatment limitations related to network adequacy and composition, the health insurer shall collect and evaluate relevant data in a manner reasonably designed to assess the aggregate impact of all such nonquantitative treatment limitations on access to mental health benefits and substance use disorder benefits as compared to medical and surgical benefits within each classification of benefits.

(2) If the relevant data evaluated under this subsection indicate that a nonquantitative treatment limitation contributes to material differences in access to mental health benefits or substance use disorder benefits as compared to medical and surgical benefits within a classification of benefits, such differences shall be considered a strong indicator of noncompliance with the federal Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 and may subject the health insurer to enforcement action pursuant to this title, and the health insurer shall submit to the commissioner documentation of reasonable actions that have been or are being taken to address the material differences and to ensure compliance, in operation, with parity requirements within fifteen (15) working days of a request from the commissioner.

(c) A health insurer shall, as part of the comparative analyses required pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-26(8) and this section, demonstrate that none of the information, evidence, sources, or standards on which a factor or evidentiary standard is based are biased or not objective in a manner that discriminates against mental health benefits or substance use disorder benefits as compared to medical and surgical benefits.

(d) An insurer providing coverage pursuant to this section for mental health benefits and substance use disorder benefits in any classification of benefits shall provide meaningful benefits for such mental health benefits and substance use disorder benefits in every classification in which medical and surgical benefits are provided. For purposes of this subsection, whether benefits are meaningful shall be determined in comparison to the medical and surgical benefits provided in the same classification and shall require, at a minimum, coverage of benefits for that mental health benefit or substance use disorder benefit in each classification in which the insurer provides benefits for one or more medical and surgical benefits. An insurer does not provide meaningful benefits under this subsection unless it provides benefits for a core treatment for that mental health benefit or substance use disorder benefit in each classification in which the insurer provides benefits for a core treatment for one or more medical and surgical benefits. If there is no core treatment for a covered mental health benefit or substance use disorder benefit with respect to a classification, the insurer shall not be required to provide benefits for a core treatment in that classification but shall provide benefits for such mental health benefit or substance use disorder benefit in every classification in which medical and surgical benefits are provided. For purposes of this subsection, “core treatment” means a standard treatment or course of treatment, therapy, service, or intervention indicated by generally accepted standards of mental health or substance use disorder care. 27-38.3-2. Relation to other mental health coverage laws. The requirements of this chapter are in addition to, and shall not be construed to limit or reduce, the obligations of health insurers under chapter 38.2 of this title or any other provision of state or federal law governing coverage of mental health or substance use disorder services. 27-38.3-3. Severability. If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications of the chapter which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this chapter are declared to be severable.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.