Skip to main content
S 2680Public Transit

Public Utilities and Carriers - Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

This bill prohibits using state funds for the current project to relocate the Providence bus hub after August 2026.

Held for study
Population
Affected
35
Introduced Feb 27, 2026Committee Senate Finance

Plain-English Summary

This legislation prevents the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) from proceeding with the current plan to relocate the central bus hub from Kennedy Plaza in Providence. Specifically, it amends state law to prohibit the use of any trust funds or state appropriations for work related to the "transit center joint development project" after August 1, 2026. This effectively cuts off funding for the existing contracts and proposals associated with moving the hub, citing high costs, unfavorable contract terms for taxpayers, and opposition from transit riders.

For younger readers

Right now, the people in charge of the buses in Rhode Island (RIPTA) want to move the main bus station in Providence to a new location. Many people who ride the bus do not want this to happen because the current station is in a good spot. Also, the new plan costs a huge amount of money. This new law says that after August 1, 2026, the state will not pay any more money for this specific plan. This means the bus station will likely stay where it is instead of moving.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Bus ridersTaxpayersRhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA)Construction contractorsDowntown Providence businesses
Impacted communities
Providence

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Protects the interests of low-income transit riders by maintaining the bus hub in a central, convenient location (Kennedy Plaza), preventing the added burden of unnecessary transfers and longer commutes.
  • Prevents the misuse of public funds on a "privatization-heavy" construction project that prioritized guaranteed vendor profits over the financial health of the public transit system.
  • Ensures that limited public resources are preserved for actual transit operations and service improvements rather than being funneled into an expensive real estate development project widely opposed by the community.
  • May result in the stagnation of infrastructure improvements at the existing Kennedy Plaza, leaving riders with facilities that some argue are outdated or insufficient for modern needs.
  • Could set a precedent for the legislature to intervene in the administrative planning of public agencies, which might be used in the future to block other progressive infrastructure projects.
  • Risks wasting the money already spent on preliminary designs and studies if the entire project is scrapped without retaining any beneficial elements for future planning.
For Conservatives
  • Demonstrates fiscal responsibility by halting a project estimated to cost up to $250 million, preventing a massive burden on taxpayers for an agency already in financial distress.
  • Stops a government contract that was structured with guaranteed profit margins and no maximum price, protecting the state from open-ended financial liability and corporate handouts.
  • Imposes accountability on an unelected bureaucratic board (RIPTA) that attempted to push through an expensive project despite lacking the funds to pay for it.
  • Represents legislative interference in the procurement process, potentially signaling to private sector businesses that the state is an unreliable partner that cancels projects mid-stream.
  • Violates the principle of separation of powers by having the legislature micromanage the operational decisions and contracts of an executive branch agency.
  • Could expose the state to legal challenges or breach-of-contract disputes from the vendors involved in the Preliminary Services Agreement, leading to wasted legal fees.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 8 additions

SECTION 1. The general assembly finds and declares that:

(1) The proposed relocation of the Providence bus hub is widely opposed by Rhode Islanders who use the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA);

(2) The project to relocate the Providence bus hub was projected, in a December 2022 cost estimate provided to the RIPTA board's finance subcommittee, to have an overall cost of between $200,000,000 and $250,000,000;

(3) RIPTA is in serious financial difficulties and would have trouble affording even a fraction of that cost estimate, which is only an estimate;

(4) Subsequently, in January 2023, RIPTA made a Request for Proposals (RFP) to potential contractors for the Providence hub relocation, in which RIPTA specified that the bids in response to the RFP could name the profit margin that the vendor would get for work including final design, building of the facility, and operation services for the yet-to-be-constructed hub;

(5) In February 2024, RIPTA signed a Preliminary Services Agreement to pay a vendor up to $16.9 million for work including public communications, initial design, and assistance in selecting a potential site for a relocated bus hub;

(6) This Preliminary Services Agreement describes many details of how this vendor's potential ensuing contract with RIPTA (for final design, building of the facility, and operation services for the yet-to-be-constructed hub) will look like, and in particular it specifies that this potential ensuing contract with the vendor would grant the vendor the same profit margin that the vendor asked for in its response to the RFP;

(7) Big contracts with a guaranteed profit margin and no maximum price are dangerous for the taxpayer;

(8) RIPTA has taken no steps, either in the RFP or subsequently, to ensure that there is an enforceable maximum price for this hub relocation project;

(9) It is not in the state's interest for RIPTA, with its financial difficulties, to enter into a subsequent contract where the vendor gets the guaranteed profit margin it asked for on top of whatever the vendor's costs or expected costs turn out to be, where these costs are likely to be in the hundreds of millions;

(10) The existing Kennedy Plaza bus hub is located at the site where many of Providence's major streets converge, which is convenient for buses and riders alike, and Kennedy Plaza could be renovated for a fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars that it would likely cost to relocate the hub;

(11) Most bus riders who get off the bus in Kennedy Plaza are doing so not to transfer to another bus but to get to nearby destinations;

(12) If the Providence hub was relocated, many of these bus riders who have their final destination in the Kennedy Plaza area would have to transfer buses at the new hub, forcing them to take an additional unnecessary bus trip;

(13) The only contract currently in effect with the vendor, the Preliminary Services Agreement, has an off-ramp provision that allows RIPTA to terminate it at any time without paying for any not-yet-done work;

(14) However, RIPTA’s RFP and its other legal agreements failed to specify that RIPTA has any off-ramp rights once a subsequent contract is signed;

(15) It is in the state's best interest for RIPTA to exercise its option to terminate the Preliminary Services Agreement so that any further work done on the Providence bus hub is done under an RFP that better safeguards taxpayers' and riders' interests.

SECTION 2. Section 39-18-10 of the General Laws in Chapter 39-18 entitled "Rhode Island Public Transit Authority" is hereby amended to read as follows: 39-18-10. Trust funds.

(a) All moneys received pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, whether as proceeds from the sale of bonds or as revenues, shall be deemed to be trust funds to be held and applied solely as provided in this chapter. The authority may, in the resolution authorizing the bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, provide for the payment of the proceeds of the sale of the bonds and the revenues to be received to a trustee, which shall be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state, which shall act as trustee of the bonds and hold and apply the bonds to the purposes of this chapter, subject to this chapter and to regulations as the resolution or trust agreement may provide, or may provide for the funds to be held in a separate account of the authority maintained at any bank within or without the state to be disbursed therefrom on the instructions of such officer or officers of the authority as may be so authorized and empowered by resolution of the authority.

(b) Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, no proceeds from trust funds subject to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section nor any appropriations provided by the state to the authority shall be used for any work performed after August 1, 2026, pursuant to the “transit center joint development project” request for proposals (RFP) issued in January, 2023 and/or pursuant to the preliminary services agreement executed in February, 2024 which covered a portion of the process contemplated in that RFP.

SECTION 3. This act shall take effect upon passage.