Skip to main content
S 2642Consumer Protection

Commercial Law - General Regulatory Provisions - Protecting Rhode Islanders from Coercive Economic Tactics at Grocery Stores

Prohibits grocery suppliers from giving unfair price discounts to large supermarket chains that are not available to smaller independent grocers.

Held for study
Population
Affected
85
Introduced Feb 27, 2026Committee Senate Commerce

Plain-English Summary

This legislation, known as the "Price Tags Act," aims to ensure fair competition in the grocery industry. It prohibits large food suppliers from offering better prices or terms to huge supermarket chains ("dominant covered retailers") than they offer to smaller independent grocery stores, provided the purchase volume is similar. It requires transparency in pricing and allows smaller retailers to see anonymized terms given to larger competitors. The bill essentially bans price discrimination and coercive tactics by large chains, allowing the Attorney General or injured businesses to sue for damages if these rules are violated.

For younger readers

This bill is trying to make things fair for all grocery stores, whether they are huge supermarkets or small corner stores. Right now, giant store chains can force the companies that make food (like cereal or soup) to sell it to them much cheaper than they sell it to small stores. This bill says that if a store buys the same amount of food, they should pay the same price. It stops the big companies from bullying food makers into giving them secret deals, helping small local businesses compete fairly.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Independent grocery store ownersLarge supermarket chainsFood and consumer goods suppliersGrocery wholesalersGrocery shoppers
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
Amount unknown

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Promotes economic equity by protecting small, independent grocers—often family-owned or minority-owned businesses—from predatory pricing tactics used by massive corporate chains.
  • Could help sustain grocery stores in low-income neighborhoods and "food deserts," ensuring vulnerable communities maintain access to fresh food sources that might otherwise be driven out of business by big-box stores.
  • Empowers the state Attorney General to take legal action against corporate monopolies engaging in coercive trade practices, strengthening regulatory oversight of capitalism.
  • Large corporations may exploit the "efficiency" and "self-distribution" defenses in the bill to continue discriminatory pricing, potentially rendering the reform less effective than intended.
  • If large chains lose their volume discounts, they might raise shelf prices for consumers rather than absorbing the cost, which would disproportionately hurt low-income working families.
  • The immunity clause for suppliers who claim they were "coerced" by retailers might allow complicit corporations to evade accountability for their role in price-fixing schemes.
For Conservatives
  • Supports small business owners and local entrepreneurs by preventing large, multi-state conglomerates from using their sheer size to crush local competition through non-market tactics.
  • Ensures that market competition is based on actual efficiency and service quality rather than backroom deals and coercive leverage by dominant market players.
  • Establishes a private right of action, allowing businesses to settle disputes through the courts rather than relying solely on a new, taxpayer-funded government bureaucracy.
  • Represents a significant government intrusion into the free market by dictating the terms of private contracts and negotiations between suppliers and retailers.
  • Imposes heavy regulatory burdens on businesses to track, justify, and disclose their pricing structures, which will increase administrative costs and reduce operational freedom.
  • Penalizes successful large-scale businesses for achieving economies of scale, effectively punishing success and efficiency in the name of government-mandated "fairness."

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 133 additions

It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:

SECTION 1. Title 6 of the General Laws entitled "COMMERCIAL LAW — GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: 6-63-1. Short title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Price Tags Act”. 6-63-2. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter:

(1) “Channels of trade” means the distinct and diverse pathways through which covered goods are marketed, distributed, and sold to consumers in the United States, including traditional supermarkets, hypermarkets, discount stores, convenience stores, online or e-commerce retailers, specialty food stores, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, and any other retail establishments, platforms, or entities that engage in the sale of covered goods, either primarily or as a segment of their broader retail offering, and compete for consumer grocery dollars.

(2) “Covered goods” means a grocery item, including any item described in paragraph (1) or (2) of the definition of eligible foods under section 271.2 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, or a consumer-packaged goods and excludes gasoline, prescription drugs, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages.

(3) “Covered retailer” means a person that sells covered goods to end purchasers at one or more physical locations in Rhode Island.

(4) “Covered supplier” means a person that:

(i) Produces and sells covered goods in Rhode Island; and

(ii) Sells, directly or through its agent or any third party with which the covered supplier contracts, covered goods produced or manufactured by the person, directly or through its agent or any third party with which the covered supplier contracts, to covered retailers or covered wholesalers in an aggregate amount exceeding six billion dollars ($6,000,000,000) (as adjusted each year by an amount equal to the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor) per year.

(5) “Covered wholesaler” means a person that purchases covered goods for the purpose of reselling or distributing them to covered retailers in Rhode Island.

(6) “Dominant covered retailer” means a covered retailer with:

(i) Annual retail sales of covered goods in an aggregate amount exceeding eighteen billion dollars ($18,000,000,000) (as adjusted each year by an amount equal to the percentage increase, if any, in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor); and

(ii) Not less than one storefront or distribution center located in more than twenty (20) states including Rhode Island operated by the covered retailer, the covered retailer’s parent company, and/or subsidiaries of the same parent company.

(7) “Person” includes:

(i) Each entity that a person owns or controls, in whole or in part; and

(ii) Each entity that owns or controls the person, in whole or in part;

(8) “Pricing differential” means, with respect to the volume unit basis of a covered good purchased by a covered retailer or covered wholesaler compared to the volume unit basis of a product purchased a dominant covered retailer, means:

(i) The difference in price of the product multiplied by the quantity sold; or

(ii) The difference in the price equivalent of the terms of sale of the product, discounted to present value, if needed, to account for any difference in payment terms, multiplied by the quantity sold.

(9) “Same covered good” means, with respect to two (2) different covered goods, a covered good and any other covered good sold under the same brand that differs only in quantity or packaging.

(10) “Same terms of sale” means, with respect to two (2) different agreements, terms of sale that are identical on a per unit basis, excluding shipping and delivery costs, which may vary on account of distance, speed, or method of shipping and delivery, or availability of self- distribution.

(11) “Terms of sale” means all substantive terms and conditions of sale commonly subject to negotiation and competition, including price, discounts, rebates, delivery terms, payment terms, package size, promotional allowances, marketing devices, merchandising arrangements, terms of distribution, and any other similar terms, considered on a per unit basis as appropriate.

(12) “Volume unit basis” means the base unit of measurement, not exceeding a truckload, by which purchase quantities are measured in purchase agreements between a covered supplier and a covered retailer or covered wholesaler. 6-63-3. Ensuring price fairness. It shall be unlawful for:

(1) A covered supplier, directly or through its agent, to fail to extend the same terms of sale of a covered good to all covered retailers and covered wholesalers that purchase the covered good on the same volume unit basis in reasonably contemporaneous sales;

(2) A covered supplier to fail to provide, within fourteen (14) days of a written request from a covered retailer or covered wholesaler that has purchased a covered good or received an offer including terms of sale for a covered good from the covered supplier, directly or through its agent, the anonymized terms of sale from all contracts with dominant covered retailers that purchased the same covered good on the same volume unit basis during the one hundred eighty

(180) day period prior to which the purchase or offer including terms of sale was made;

(3) A covered supplier, directly or through its agent, to refuse the sale of a covered good to a covered retailer or a covered wholesaler if:

(i) The covered retailer is not a dominant covered retailer;

(ii) The covered retailer or the covered wholesaler has made and completed payment for purchases from the covered supplier within the previous twelve (12) months;

(iii) The covered retailer or the covered wholesaler has made a request of the covered supplier to provide to such retailer or wholesaler the same terms of sale provided to other covered retailers or covered wholesalers, consistent with the terms of this section; and

(iv) A refusal by the covered supplier to sell a covered good to the covered retailer or covered wholesaler has no commercially reasonable justification;

(4) A dominant covered retailer, or its purchasing agent or any third party through which a dominant covered retailer contracts to purchase covered goods, directly or indirectly, to take any action that such dominant covered retailer, purchasing agent, or third party intends, knows, or should know will coerce or induce a covered supplier to violate this section. 6-63-4. Agency liability. A covered supplier or dominant covered retailer, as applicable, shall be liable for any violation of § 6-63-3 by a contracted third party. 6-63-5. Defenses. A person alleged to have engaged in unlawful conduct described in § 6-63-3 shall not be liable for such conduct on showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that:

(1) Any difference in the terms of sale was predominantly attributable to a covered retailer engaging in self-distribution of the covered good at issue or otherwise lowering the overall costs of the covered supplier through genuine efficiencies including, but not limited to, economies in distribution or manufacturing;

(2) A covered retailer, in exchange for commercially reasonable consideration, voluntarily accepted terms of sale relating to a covered good that were not the same terms of sale as the terms of sale offered to another covered retailer;

(3) The terms of sale applied only to cases in which there was an actual or imminent deterioration of perishable goods, obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned. 6-63-6. Covered supplier immunity. Provided that a covered supplier did not collude with the relevant dominant retailer in any scheme violative of the antitrust laws, a covered supplier shall be immune from liability for a violation of § 6-63-3 where the defendant covered supplier shows by a preponderance of the evidence that:

(1) The violation was imposed on or required of the defendant covered supplier by a dominant covered retailer;

(2) The defendant covered supplier would have suffered substantial harm to its business were it to refuse the demand of the dominant retailer; and

(3) The defendant covered supplier made a good faith effort to disclose the dominant covered retailer’s conduct to the office of the attorney general. 6-63-7. Enforcement. The attorney general or a covered retailer, covered wholesaler, or covered supplier injured by a violation of this chapter may file suit to:

(1) Obtain an injunction to cure a violation of this chapter;

(2) Obtain a civil penalty or damages in an amount not greater than:

(i) One and one-half (1½) the actual damages; or

(ii) The pricing differential suffered by a covered retailer or a covered wholesaler; or

(3) Both subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. 6-63-8. Rules of construction. Definition. For purposes of this chapter, the term “antitrust laws”:

(1) Has the meaning given that term in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12(a)); and

(2) Includes:

(i) Section 45 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to the extent such

section 45 applies to unfair methods of competition; and

(ii) Includes any Rhode Island law similar to the laws described in subsection (1) and (2)(i) of this section.

(2) No effect on antitrust laws. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or an amendment made by this chapter, this chapter shall not be construed to limit, impair, or supersede any of the antitrust laws. 6-63-9. Severability. If any portion of this chapter is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, such finding shall not affect any other portion of said chapter not specifically so found.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.