S 2582Housing

Towns and Cities - Low and Moderate Income Housing

Mandates that new developments in Tiverton consist of 50% affordable units if the town is below state housing quotas.

Held for study

Population
Affected

Introduced Feb 13, 2026Committee Senate Housing & Municipal Government

Plain-English Summary

This legislation specifically targets the town of Tiverton regarding its available housing stock. It mandates that if the town has not met the state requirement of having at least 10% of its housing classified as affordable, stricter development rules apply. Specifically, any new development project approved in Tiverton must designate at least 50% of its units as affordable housing. This requirement for developers remains in effect until Tiverton reaches the 10% threshold for affordable housing inventory required by state law.

For younger readers

This law creates a strict rule for builders in the town of Tiverton. The state wants every town to have enough homes that cost less money, so that more people can afford to live there. Right now, Tiverton needs more of these homes. This law says that until the town has enough lower-cost homes, any builder who wants to build a new neighborhood there must make sure that half of the new homes are affordable. This helps ensure there are places to live for people who don't have a lot of money.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups

Real Estate DevelopersTiverton Town PlannersLow-income Home Buyers/RentersConstruction CompaniesTiverton Taxpayers

Impacted communities

Tiverton

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

Moderate risk

There is a moderate to high constitutional risk regarding the "Takings Clause" of the 5th Amendment. Mandating a 50% set-aside for affordable housing is significantly higher than standard inclusionary zoning (usually 10-20%). If this requirement renders a property economically useless or unprofitable for the developer, it could be argued as a regulatory taking requiring just compensation. Additionally, singling out Tiverton specifically could raise Equal Protection concerns if other towns have similar deficiencies but aren't subject to the same mandate.

Estimated cost

None

Estimated revenue

None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints

For Progressives

Aggressively addresses the shortage of affordable housing in Tiverton, ensuring that low-income individuals and families are not priced out of the community.
Promotes economic integration by mandating a significant portion of new inventory be accessible to working-class residents, preventing the creation of exclusive, wealthy-only enclaves.
Prioritizes human needs over corporate profits by forcing developers to contribute substantially to the social safety net as a condition of doing business.
The 50% threshold is so high that it may make projects financially unviable for private developers, potentially causing all construction to stop and resulting in zero new affordable units being built.
Relies on the private market to solve a public infrastructure crisis rather than providing direct government funding or construction of public housing.
Singles out one specific municipality rather than creating a comprehensive, statewide systemic reform for housing equity.

For Conservatives

Upholds the rule of law by creating strict consequences for a municipality that fails to meet long-standing state statutory requirements for housing quotas.
May inadvertently preserve the rural character of the town by discouraging large-scale developers from building, as the profit margins would be destroyed by the mandate.
Clarifies the exact expectations for businesses operating in the town, removing ambiguity about what is required for permit approval.
Represents an extreme form of government overreach into the free market by dictating that half of a private business's product must be sold at a price controlled by the government.
Violates property rights and freedom of contract, likely driving developers and construction businesses out of the town and hurting the local economy.
Sets a dangerous precedent for state government targeting specific municipalities with punitive mandates rather than applying laws equally across the state.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 7 additions

It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 45-53 of the General Laws entitled "Low and Moderate Income Housing" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following section: 45-53-17. Tiverton affordable housing units. In the town of Tiverton, at any time that there exists less than ten percent (10%) affordable housing in accordance with the provisions of § 45-53-3.1, the minimum number of affordable housing units to be built by any developer in the town pursuant to any approved plan, permit or project shall comprise of at least fifty percent (50%), of the units or dwellings constituting or consisting of affordable housing units until there exists full compliance with affordable housing requirements of chapter 53 of title 45.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.