Skip to main content
S 2565Civil Rights

Businesses and Professions - "The Rhode Island Informed Consent Protection Act"

This bill prohibits doctors, insurers, and employers from discriminating against people who refuse vaccinations and bans financial incentives for administering vaccines.

Introduced
Population
Affected
62
Introduced Feb 13, 2026Committee Senate Health & Human Services

Plain-English Summary

The "Rhode Island Informed Consent Protection Act" prohibits discrimination against individuals who choose to delay or decline vaccinations. It mandates that healthcare providers, insurance companies, and employers cannot deny services, coverage, or employment based on an individual's vaccination status. The bill requires medical practitioners to obtain written informed consent before administering vaccines and bans them from accepting financial incentives for doing so. Additionally, it prevents the Department of Children, Youth and Families from initiating child abuse investigations solely because a parent refuses to vaccinate their child. Violations can result in significant fines and civil liability.

For younger readers

This new rule helps protect people who decide they do not want to get a shot, like a vaccine. It says that doctors cannot refuse to help a patient just because they didn't get a shot. It also says that bosses cannot fire workers or refuse to hire them for not getting a shot. The rule makes sure that before someone gets a vaccine, they understand exactly what it is and agree to it in writing. It also promises that parents won't get in trouble with the government just for choosing not to give their children these shots.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Healthcare PractitionersInsurance CompaniesEmployersParentsPatients
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

Moderate risk

Moderate. The bill imposes significant restrictions on private employers (freedom of association/contract) and insurance companies (business operations). While states have broad police powers regarding health and welfare, prohibiting private businesses from making hiring decisions based on health safety standards could be challenged. However, the bill frames this as a civil rights/anti-discrimination issue, which is generally within state power to regulate.

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
Amount unknown

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Protects bodily autonomy and civil liberties by ensuring that medical decisions, such as vaccination, remain a personal choice made without coercion or the threat of losing employment or healthcare.
  • Reduces the influence of profit-driven pharmaceutical corporations in the doctor-patient relationship by prohibiting practitioners from accepting bonuses or financial incentives for administering vaccines.
  • Safeguards access to essential services and employment for marginalized individuals who might otherwise face economic exclusion or denial of care based on their personal medical choices.
  • Undermines public health initiatives and herd immunity, potentially exposing immunocompromised individuals and the broader community to preventable infectious diseases.
  • Restricts the ability of private employers and healthcare facilities to maintain safe environments for their workers and patients, potentially infringing on the rights of those who wish to avoid exposure to unvaccinated individuals.
  • May burden the social safety net and public healthcare system by potentially increasing the rate of preventable illnesses, leading to higher costs and resource strain.
For Conservatives
  • Strongly upholds individual liberty and personal freedom by preventing government and employer mandates regarding medical decisions, ensuring citizens are not forced into medical procedures.
  • Protects parental rights by explicitly preventing the state from investigating or punishing parents through child protective services solely based on their decisions regarding their children's vaccination schedules.
  • Combats potential corporate overreach by preventing insurance companies from weaponizing coverage denial or premium increases to force compliance with medical protocols.
  • Imposes significant government regulations on private businesses, infringing on the rights of business owners to determine their own hiring criteria and workplace safety standards.
  • Interferes with the free market by dictating the terms of contracts between insurance companies, healthcare providers, and patients, rather than allowing the market to set risk-based rates.
  • Creates new legal liabilities for businesses and medical practices by banning liability waivers and establishing steep fines, which could increase the cost of doing business and practicing medicine.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 65 additions

SECTION 1. Title 5 of the General Laws entitled "BUSINESSES AND PROFESSIONS" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: 5-37.9-1. Short title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as "The Rhode Island Informed Consent Protection Act." 5-37.9-2. Definitions. The following words and phrases as used in this chapter shall have the following meanings:

(1) "Department" means the Rhode Island department of health.

(2) "Director" means the director of the Rhode Island department of health.

(3) "Emergency medical condition" shall have the same meaning as contained in § 27-18- 76.

(4) "Informed consent" means the permission granted with knowledge of the possible consequences, to include full knowledge of the possible risks and benefits and with voluntary agreement being absent of coercion, threat or punishment.

(5) "License" means any license or registration issued or regulated by the department of health, to practice medicine, provide healthcare services or to provide institutional healthcare services.

(6) "Practitioner" means any person in possession of a license or registration and engaged in providing healthcare services. 5-37.9-3. Nondiscrimination for vaccine refusal.

(a) A practitioner or a healthcare facility may not discriminate against a patient or parent or guardian of a patient, based solely upon a patient or parent or guardian of a patient choosing to delay or decline a vaccination. Exercising the right to informed consent by delaying or declining vaccinations under this chapter, may not be the reason for a patient or family member of a patient to be dismissed from a practice or lose medical privileges or benefits.

(b) A practitioner or healthcare facility shall not harass, coerce, or threaten a patient or parent or guardian of a patient for exercising the right to delay or decline a vaccination.

(c) Any insurer as defined in § 27-18.4-1, shall not deny coverage, increase a premium or otherwise discriminate against an insured or applicant for insurance based on the individual's choice to delay or decline a vaccination for the individual, or the individual's child.

(d) No employer shall deny employment, terminate employment, or otherwise discriminate against an individual based on the individual's choice to delay or decline vaccination.

(e) No insurer shall discriminate against a practitioner or healthcare facility by decreasing reimbursement, by imposition of financial penalties, or by denial of participation in an insurance plan as a result of a practitioner's decision to not vaccinate a patient. 5-37.9-4. Prohibited activities.

(a) A practitioner shall not accept a monetary payment in the form of a bonus or other incentive from an insurance company or pharmaceutical company for patient vaccination.

(b) A practitioner shall not require a patient or parent or guardian of a patient to sign a liability waiver, as a condition to receive medical care in the event the patient or parent or guardian of a patient chooses to delay or decline a vaccination. 5-37.9-5. Informed consent in writing. Practitioners providing vaccines shall provide informed consent in writing, to be signed by the recipient, or in the case of a minor child the signature of a parent or legal guardian shall be acquired prior to administration of the vaccine. The language of the informed consent shall be approved by the director and shall contain an advisement of the right to decline the vaccine, and information regarding the possibility of recovery pursuant to a claim filed for injury resulting from a covered vaccine by petition to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. 5-37.9-6. Civil recovery and penalties.

(a) Any person who violates the provisions of this chapter may be held liable for actual damages.

(b) Any person who, after a hearing is found to have intentionally and knowingly violated the provision of this chapter, shall be fined not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) per patient, per violation. 5-37.9-7. Rules and regulations. The director of the department of health shall develop rules and regulations to implement the provisions of this chapter. 5-37.9-8. Enforcement. The director shall have the power to investigate complaints of violation of this chapter by any practitioner, to conduct evidentiary hearings, impose discipline and fines for violations. 5-37.9-9. Appeal procedure. In the case of any adverse determination by the director pursuant to § 5-37.9-8, appeals may be taken in accordance with the administrative procedures act, chapter 35 of title 42.

SECTION 2. Section 40-11-3 of the General Laws in Chapter 40-11 entitled "Abused and Neglected Children" is hereby amended to read as follows: 40-11-3. Duty to report — Deprivation of nutrition or medical treatment.

(a) Any person who has reasonable cause to know or suspect that any child has been abused or neglected as defined in § 40-11-2, or has been a victim of sexual abuse by another child, shall, within twenty-four (24) hours, transfer that information to the department of children, youth and families, or its agent, which shall cause the report to be investigated immediately. As a result of those reports and referrals, protective social services shall be made available to those children in an effort to safeguard and enhance the welfare of those children and to provide a means to prevent further abuse or neglect. The department shall establish and implement a single, statewide, toll-free telephone to operate twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week for the receipt of reports concerning child abuse and neglect, which reports shall be electronically recorded and placed in the central registry established by § 42-72-7. The department shall create a sign, using a format that is clear, simple, and understandable to students, that contains the statewide, toll-free telephone number for posting in all public and private schools in languages predominately spoken in the state, containing pertinent information relating to reporting the suspicion of child abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse. This sign shall be available to the school districts electronically. The electronically recorded records, properly indexed by date and other essential, identifying data, shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years; provided, however, any person who has been reported for child abuse and/or neglect, and who has been determined not to have neglected and/or abused a child, shall have his or her record expunged as to that incident three (3) years after that determination. The department shall continuously maintain a management-information database that includes all of the information required to implement this section, including the number of cases reported by hospitals, healthcare centers, emergency rooms, and other appropriate healthcare facilities.

(b) The reporting shall include immediate notification of the department of any instance where parents of an infant have requested deprivation of nutrition that is necessary to sustain life and/or who have requested deprivation of medical or surgical intervention that is necessary to remedy or ameliorate a life-threatening medical condition, if the nutrition or medical or surgical intervention is generally provided to similar nutritional, medical, or surgical conditioned infants, whether disabled or not. No investigation shall be initiated against a parent or guardian for the sole reason that the parent or guardian chose to delay or decline a vaccination for a child of the parent or under the care of the guardian.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to prevent a child’s parents and physician from discontinuing the use of life-support systems or nonpalliative treatment for a child who is terminally ill where, in the opinion of the child’s physician exercising competent medical judgment, the child has no reasonable chance of recovery from the terminal illness despite every, appropriate medical treatment to correct the condition.

SECTION 3. This act shall take effect upon passage.