Skip to main content
S 2476Housing

State Affairs and Government - Lead Hazard Mitigation

This bill exempts certain rentals from lead rules but allows tenants to sue non-compliant landlords for significant damages.

Held for study
Population
Affected
35
Introduced Feb 6, 2026Committee Senate Housing & Municipal Government

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends the Rhode Island Lead Hazard Mitigation Act. It creates a new exemption from lead hazard mitigation requirements for pre-1978 rental dwellings that do not house "at-risk" occupants, such as children. The bill also establishes a private right of action, allowing tenants to sue property owners for violations of the act, potentially resulting in double or treble damages and attorney's fees. Furthermore, it modifies the procedures for tenants to deposit rent into a court escrow account when lead hazards exist and prohibits landlords from retaliating against tenants who utilize these legal remedies.

For younger readers

This law changes the rules for keeping rental homes safe from lead paint, which can hurt children. If a rental home does not have any children or pregnant women living there, the landlord might not have to follow some of the safety rules. However, if a landlord breaks the lead safety laws, the people living there can sue them for a lot of money. The law also lets renters pay their rent to a court instead of the landlord until the house is fixed, and it stops landlords from punishing renters who complain about lead.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
LandlordsTenantsAt-risk occupantsAttorneysJudges
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

The bill limits a landlord's right to terminate tenancy or raise rent under specific circumstances (retaliation). While generally upheld in housing law, extreme restrictions on property management rights can sometimes raise Fifth Amendment "takings" concerns or Due Process issues if the definition of retaliation is too broad or lacks sufficient landlord recourse. However, given existing precedent for tenant protections and health mandates, the risk is low.

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Empowers tenants with a private right of action, allowing them to sue non-compliant landlords for up to treble damages and attorney fees, significantly increasing accountability for safe housing.
  • Strengthens tenant protections by explicitly prohibiting specific retaliatory actions, such as eviction or rent increases, against renters who exercise their legal rights regarding lead hazards.
  • Solidifies the process for tenants to withhold rent into a court escrow account when lead hazards exist, ensuring economic pressure is applied to landlords to force necessary safety repairs.
  • Creates a loophole by exempting pre-1978 rental units without "at-risk" occupants from mitigation requirements, potentially leaving housing stock dangerous for future tenants or visiting children.
  • Changes the court's mandate from "shall" to "may" regarding releasing escrow funds to tenants for repairs, potentially making it more difficult for low-income tenants to be reimbursed for fixing hazards themselves.
  • Reduces the universal standard of lead safety, shifting away from the goal of making all housing stock lead-safe and potentially allowing landlords to neglect properties based on current demographics.
For Conservatives
  • Reduces regulatory burdens on property owners by exempting pre-1978 rental units that do not house at-risk occupants from costly lead hazard mitigation requirements.
  • Adds a due process protection for landlords by requiring tenants to provide adequate written notice of intent to conduct repairs before they can claim reimbursement from escrowed funds.
  • Streamlines the statute by removing obsolete language and expired compliance dates, making the regulatory code cleaner and less confusing for property owners.
  • Imposes severe financial penalties on property owners by authorizing double or treble damages and attorney's fees in private lawsuits, which could bankrupt small landlords for technical violations.
  • Expands the ability of tenants to withhold rent and place it in escrow, potentially depriving property owners of the cash flow needed to maintain the property or pay mortgages.
  • Interferes with private property management by restricting a landlord's ability to terminate tenancies or raise rent, labeling such standard business decisions as "retaliatory" if a tenant has complained.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 13 additions · 16 deletions

SECTION 1. Sections 42-128.1-8, 42-128.1-11 and 42-128.1-14 of the General Laws in Chapter 42-128.1 entitled "Lead Hazard Mitigation" are hereby amended to read as follows: 42-128.1-8. Duties of property owners of pre-1978 rental dwellings.

(a) Property owners of pre-1978 rental dwellings, which have not been made lead safe or have not been lead hazard abated shall comply with all the following requirements:

(1) Learn about lead hazards by taking a lead hazard awareness seminar, themself or through a designated person;

(2) Evaluate the dwelling unit and premises for lead hazards consistent with the requirements for a lead hazard control evaluation;

(3) Correct identified lead hazards by meeting and maintaining the lead hazard mitigation standard;

(4) Provide tenants: (i) Basic information about lead hazard control; (ii) A copy of the independent clearance inspection; and (iii) Information about how to give notice of deteriorating conditions; and

(5) Correct lead hazards within thirty (30) days after notification from the tenant of a dwelling unit with an at-risk occupant, or as provided for by § 34-18-22.

(b) New property owners of a pre-1978 rental dwelling that is occupied by an at-risk occupant shall have up to sixty (60) days to meet requirements for lead hazard mitigation, if those requirements were not met by the previous owner at the time of transfer, provided that the new property owner has the property visually inspected within thirty (30) business days after assuming ownership to determine conformity with the lead hazard control standard.

(c) The requirements for lead hazard mitigation shall apply to the first change in ownership or tenancy after November 1, 2005; provided further, that unless requested and agreed to by an at- risk occupant, meeting the lead hazard mitigation standard shall not be construed to authorize a property owner to compel or cause a person, who is in tenancy on January 1, 2004, and remains in tenancy continuously thereafter, to vacate a rental unit temporarily or otherwise.

(d) If the tenant receives no response to the notification to the property owner of deteriorating conditions affecting lead hazards, if the response is in the tenant’s opinion unsatisfactory, or if the remedy performed is in the tenant’s opinion unsatisfactory, the tenant may request a review of the matter by the department of health. After its review of the matter, the department of health shall either send notice to the property owner in which notice shall be issued in a manner substantially similar to a notice of violation issued by the director pursuant to the Housing Maintenance Code, chapter 24.3 of title 45, or promptly inform the tenant of the reasons why the notice is not being issued.

(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this chapter shall not apply to common areas in condominium complexes that are owned and operated by condominium associations, or to pre-1978 rental dwelling units that are:

(1) Lead-safe or lead free;

(2) Temporary housing; or

(3) Elderly housing.; or

(4) [Deleted by P.L. 2023, ch. 103, § 1 and P.L. 2023, ch. 104, § 1.]

(5) Do not house or contain an at-risk occupant.

(f) The department of health shall report to the legislature annually on the number of children who are lead poisoned in any of the exempted dwelling units as referred to in subsection

(e) of this section.

(g) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent an owner who is seeking to obtain lead liability insurance coverage in the policy from complying with the provisions of this chapter, by securing and maintaining a valid and in force letter of compliance or conformance in force. 42-128.1-11. Enforcement.

(a) The standards for lead hazard control and for lead hazard mitigation in pre-1978 housing shall be considered basic housing standards and shall be enforceable through the provisions of this chapter and through procedures established in chapter 24.2 of title 45 and chapter 24.3 of title 45.

(b) Minimum Housing Standards and Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Code. In order to establish consistency between state and local programs pertaining to enforcement of standards for housing and housing occupancy and to provide for broadly available, multiple means of identifying instances of noncompliance with this chapter and enforcing the requirements of this chapter, the department of health shall undertake consistent with § 34-18-58. following provisions regarding Minimum Housing Standards and the Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Code shall be effective:

(1) The ordinances, rules, and regulations for “Minimum Housing Standards” adopted pursuant to § 45-24.2-3 shall, on or before November 1, 2005, include provisions for lead hazard control.

(2) The Housing Maintenance and Occupancy Code, established by chapter 24.3 of title 45, shall, effective November 1, 2005, include provisions consistent with a continuing and ongoing responsibility for lead hazard mitigation as required by the department of health standards.

(c) In any private action where a property owner is found to have violated § 42-128.1-1 et seq., or any rules or regulations derived therefrom, the property owner is subject to damages, which may include double or treble the actual damages found, as well as reasonable attorneys’ fees. Nothing herein should be construed as excluding other remedies in law or equity. 42-128.1-14. Escrow account.

(a) Notwithstanding any general law, public law, special law, or any agreement, whether written or oral, a tenant may file a petition to deposit the tenant’s rent in an escrow account in the district court with jurisdiction of the leased property, whenever the leased property is not compliant with the risk reduction provisions of this chapter, including, but not limited to, the requirement for a valid certificate of conformance, any rules or regulations derived therefrom, or upon any licensed inspector’s finding of the existence of lead hazards in the property. Upon the petition to the district court, and after notice to the owner of the premises and a hearing thereon, the district court shall order the deposit of the tenant’s rent within the registry of the court, consistent with district court rules of procedure, upon a determination that the leased property is not compliant with the risk reduction provisions of this chapter, or upon any licensed inspector’s finding of the existence of lead hazards in the property.

(b) Other rights or remedies. The right of a tenant to deposit rent in the registry of the court does not preclude the tenant from pursuing any other right or remedy available to the tenant at law or equity.

(c) Release of funds within the registry of the court. Money deposited within the registry of the court shall be released to the property owner, or designee, upon the court’s determination of compliance by the property owner with the applicable risk reduction standard and state lead poisoning prevention laws or upon a finding that the release of the money to the owner is necessary to effectuate any repairs or improvements needed to the property to bring it into compliance with the lead laws, and/or to repair any lead hazard(s).

(d) Notwithstanding subsection (c), the court shall may release money from the registry of the court to the tenant, or designee, if the tenant has incurred costs to comply with the applicable risk reduction standard and state lead poisoning prevention laws on presentation of a bill of the reasonable costs of complying with the applicable risk reduction standard or other state lead poisoning prevention laws. Provided, however that, a tenant has provided adequate written notice of its intent to conduct any repairs or remediation to the landlord, and the landlord has willfully failed to take corrective action or failed to respond within a reasonable timeframe. Any money to be released under this subsection shall be subtracted from the money to be released under subsection (c).

(e) Retaliatory actions prohibited. A lessee may not be evicted, the tenancy may not be terminated, the rent may not be raised, or any services reduced, because a lessee in good faith elects to seek the remedies under this section.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.