Skip to main content
S 2393Ethics & Transparency

Public Records - Access to Public Records

This bill prohibits anonymous public records requests, requiring requesters to provide their name and contact information to be processed.

Held for study
Population
Affected
25
Introduced Jan 30, 2026Committee Senate Judiciary

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends the Rhode Island "Access to Public Records" law. Its primary change is the prohibition of anonymous public records requests. Under this bill, anyone requesting public documents must provide sufficient identifying information, specifically their name and a valid mailing or email address, to verify their identity and allow the agency to communicate with them. Public bodies are instructed not to process anonymous requests. Additionally, the bill mandates that public bodies post their procedures for accessing public records on their websites, if they maintain one.

For younger readers

This law changes the rules for how people ask the government for copies of official papers. Before, you might have been able to ask for these papers without saying who you are. Now, this rule says that if you want to see government records, you must tell them your name and give them your address or email. If you try to ask for papers without telling them who you are, the government offices are not allowed to help you. It also says government offices must put these rules on their websites.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
JournalistsWhistleblowersGovernment ClerksPolitical ActivistsGeneral Public
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

Moderate risk

Moderate. The First Amendment protects the right to petition the government. While courts have allowed some administrative identification requirements, banning anonymous access entirely could be challenged as a "chilling effect" on speech and inquiry, particularly for whistleblowers or those investigating controversial government actions. Additionally, the bill creates an internal statutory conflict (Section 38-2-3(j) vs Section 38-2-3(d)(3)) regarding the requirement of PII, which could lead to due process confusion.

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Ensures that government agencies can effectively communicate with requesters to clarify complex requests, potentially speeding up the release of information.
  • Prevents the abuse of the public records system by bad actors who might flood agencies with frivolous or automated requests without accountability, preserving resources for legitimate inquiries.
  • Mandates that public bodies post access procedures on their websites, increasing the visibility and accessibility of information regarding how citizens can exercise their rights.
  • Eliminates the ability to make anonymous requests, which significantly discourages whistleblowers and marginalized individuals from seeking information due to fear of retaliation or exposure.
  • Creates a barrier to access for individuals who wish to monitor government activity without being tracked, surveilled, or added to a government database.
  • Contradicts the fundamental progressive principle of open government by prioritizing administrative convenience over the absolute right of the public to inspect records regardless of identity.
For Conservatives
  • Reduces government waste and administrative burden by preventing the processing of frivolous, harassing, or automated requests made by unaccountable anonymous actors.
  • Increases personal accountability by requiring individuals to identify themselves when demanding time and resources from taxpayer-funded agencies.
  • Streamlines government operations by ensuring agencies have a direct and valid method of contact to clarify, negotiate, or deliver the results of requests.
  • Mandates that private citizens surrender personal information to the government merely to exercise their statutory right to inspect public documents.
  • Creates a de facto government registry of individuals inquiring about sensitive or political topics, potentially chilling free speech and political inquiry.
  • Expands the government's power to collect data on law-abiding citizens who are simply engaging in civic oversight and holding the state accountable.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 23 additions · 8 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 38-2-3 of the General Laws in Chapter 38-2 entitled "Access to Public Records" is hereby amended to read as follows: 38-2-3. Right to inspect and copy records — Duty to maintain minutes of meetings — Procedures for access.

(a) Except as provided in § 38-2-2(4), all records maintained or kept on file by any public body, whether or not those records are required by any law or by any rule or regulation, shall be public records and every person or entity shall have the right to inspect and/or copy those records at such reasonable time as may be determined by the custodian thereof subject to the procedures set forth in this section.

(b) Any reasonably segregable portion of a public record excluded by § 38-2-2(4) shall be available for public inspection after the deletion of the information which is the basis of the exclusion. If an entire document or record is deemed non-public, the public body shall state in writing that no portion of the document or record contains reasonable segregable information that is releasable.

(c) Each public body shall make, keep, and maintain written or recorded minutes of all meetings.

(d) Each public body shall establish written procedures regarding access to public records but. Such procedures shall not require written requests for public information available pursuant to § 42-35-2 or for other documents prepared for or readily available to the public.

(1) These procedures must include, but need not be limited to the,:

(i) The identification of a designated public records officer or unit,;

(ii) Instruction on how to make a public records request,; and

(iii) The location where a public record request should be made, and a submitted.

(2) A copy of these procedures shall be posted on the public body’s website if such a website is maintained and be made otherwise readily available to the public. The unavailability of a designated public records officer shall not be deemed constitute good cause for failure to timely comply with a request to inspect and/or copy public records pursuant to subsection (e). A written request for public records need not be made submitted on a form established by a public body if ; provided that, the request is otherwise readily identifiable as a request for public records.

(3) All requests to inspect and/or copy public records shall include sufficient identifying information to permit verification of the requester’s identity and to allow the public body to communicate regarding the request. At a minimum, a requester shall provide the requester’s name and a valid mailing address or electronic mail address. Anonymous public records requests shall not be accepted or processed.

(e) A public body receiving a request shall permit the inspection or copying within ten (10) business days after receiving a request. If the inspection or copying is not permitted within ten (10) business days, the public body shall forthwith explain in writing the need for additional time to comply with the request. Any such explanation must be particularized to the specific request made. In such cases the public body may have up to an additional twenty (20) business days to comply with the request if it can demonstrate that the voluminous nature of the request, the number of requests for records pending, or the difficulty in searching for and retrieving or copying the requested records, is such that additional time is necessary to avoid imposing an undue burden on the public body.

(f) If a public record is in active use or in storage and, therefore, not available at the time a person or entity requests access, the custodian shall so inform the person or entity and make an appointment for the person or entity to examine such records as expeditiously as they may be made available.

(g) Any person or entity requesting copies of public records may elect to obtain them in any and all media in which the public agency is capable of providing them. Any public body which maintains its records in a computer storage system shall provide any data properly identified in a printout or other reasonable format, as requested.

(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring a public body to reorganize, consolidate, or compile data not maintained by the public body in the form requested at the time the request to inspect the public records was made except to the extent that such records are in an electronic format and the public body would not be unduly burdened in providing such data.

(i) Nothing in this section is intended to affect the public record status of information merely because it is stored in a computer.

(j) No public records shall be withheld based on the purpose for which the records are sought, nor shall a public body require, as a condition of fulfilling a public records request, that a person or entity provide a reason for the request or provide personally identifiable information about him/herself.

(k) At the election of the person or entity requesting the public records, the public body shall provide copies of the public records electronically, by facsimile, or by mail in accordance with the requesting person or entity’s choice, unless complying with that preference would be unduly burdensome due to the volume of records requested or the costs that would be incurred. The person requesting delivery shall be responsible for the actual cost of delivery, if any.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.