Skip to main content
S 2300Civil Rights

State Affairs and Government - The Civil Rights Act of 1990

This bill legally defines anti-Semitism using international standards to help the state identify and investigate hate crimes and discrimination.

Introduced
Population
Affected
15
Introduced Jan 23, 2026Committee Senate Judiciary

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends Rhode Island's Civil Rights Act of 1990 to establish a specific definition for "anti-Semitism." It adopts the working definition and contemporary examples set by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). State agencies and local subdivisions must consider this definition when investigating or reviewing instances of alleged discrimination to determine if there was anti-Semitic intent. The bill explicitly clarifies that criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against other countries is not anti-Semitism and includes provisions to protect First Amendment rights.

For younger readers

This bill helps the government understand what it means to be unfair or hateful toward Jewish people. It uses a specific description called "anti-Semitism" that is used by many other countries. This helps police and government leaders know when someone is being bullied or treated badly just because they are Jewish. The bill also makes sure to say that people are still allowed to disagree with the country of Israel, just like they can disagree with any other country, as long as they aren't being hateful. It creates rules to make sure everyone is treated fairly.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Jewish CommunityState Agencies (Civil Rights Commission)Educational InstitutionsPolitical ActivistsEmployers and Landlords
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

Moderate risk

There is a moderate constitutional risk regarding the First Amendment. Critics of the IHRA definition argue that it can be used to penalize protected political speech, specifically criticism of Israel. However, the bill includes a specific savings clause stating it shall not infringe on First Amendment rights and explicitly excludes criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against other countries. Courts would likely weigh the definition's use in determining *intent* versus direct criminalization of speech.

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Strengthens protections for the Jewish community, a minority group frequently targeted by hate crimes, by providing a clear, standardized framework for identifying discriminatory intent.
  • Enhances the efficacy of civil rights enforcement by equipping state agencies with specific tools to recognize and address complex forms of bias and harassment.
  • Includes explicit language distinguishing criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism, attempting to balance protection against hate speech with the right to political dissent.
  • adoption of the IHRA definition is frequently criticized by activists for potentially conflating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, which could chill legitimate political speech regarding Palestinian rights.
  • May be utilized to target or penalize student groups and social justice movements that advocate for boycotts or sanctions against Israel, framing their activism as discriminatory.
  • Codifying a specific definition for one group's experience of discrimination could be seen as creating a hierarchy of protections rather than strengthening universal anti-discrimination standards.
For Conservatives
  • Demonstrates strong support for the Jewish community and Israel by adopting a definition widely accepted by the U.S. State Department and international allies.
  • Provides a mechanism to address anti-Semitism in educational institutions and public spaces, which many conservatives view as a growing problem.
  • Clarifies the rule of law by providing a specific, objective definition for discrimination, reducing ambiguity in how laws are applied by state agencies.
  • Expands the scope of government oversight into private interactions and speech by broadening the definitions used to investigate discrimination claims.
  • Raises concerns regarding First Amendment rights, as defining specific types of speech or expression as discriminatory could be viewed as government overreach into personal expression.
  • Could be viewed as "identity politics" legislation that carves out special legal considerations for specific groups rather than applying general principles of equality.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 20 additions

SECTION 1. Legislative findings.

(1) Anti-Semitism and harassment on the basis of actual or perceived national origin, shared ancestry, or ethnic characteristics with a religious group remains a persistent, pervasive, and disturbing problem in contemporary American society.

(2) The Jewish people continue to be a targeted minority in the United States. Data shows that Jews are among the most likely of all religious groups to be victimized by incidents of hate, and such incidents are increasing at an alarming rate.

(3) State officials and institutions, including educational institutions, have a responsibility to protect citizens from acts of hate and bigotry motivated by a discriminatory animus, including anti-Semitism, and must be given the tools to do so.

(4) Valid monitoring, informed analysis and investigation, and effective policy making all require uniform definitions.

(5) While there is no exhaustive definition of anti-Semitism, as it can take many forms, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition has been an essential tool used to determine contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism and includes useful examples of discriminatory anti-Israel acts that cross the line into anti-Semitism.

(6) On May 26, 2016, the member states of the IHRA, including the United States, adopted the non-legally binding working definition of anti-Semitism at its plenary session in Bucharest. This definition is used by various agencies of the federal government and the other thirty-three (33) governments that are members of the IHRA. The definition has been recommended for use by the European Council and the Secretary General of the Organization of American States, included in policy guides prepared by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and formally adopted by a growing number of European nations.

(7) Awareness of this conduct-based definition of anti-Semitism, although it is not to be taken as an exclusive definition, will increase understanding of the parameters of contemporary anti-Jewish crime and discrimination in certain circumscribed areas.

SECTION 2. Section 42-112-1 of the General Laws in Chapter 42-112 entitled "The Civil Rights Act of 1990" is hereby amended to read as follows: 42-112-1. Discrimination prohibited.

(a) All persons within the state, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, disability, age, or country of ancestral origin, have, except as is otherwise provided or permitted by law, the same rights to make and enforce contracts, to inherit, purchase, to lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property, and are subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.

(b) For the purposes of this section, the right to “make and enforce contracts, to inherit, purchase, to lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property” includes the making, performance, modification and termination of contracts and rights concerning real or personal property, and the enjoyment of all benefits, terms, and conditions of the contractual and other relationships.

(c) Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to affect chapter 14.1 of title 37, chapter 5.1 of title 28, or any other remedial programs designed to address past societal discrimination.

(d) For the purposes of this section, the terms “sex” and “age” have the same meaning as those terms are defined in § 28-5-6, the state fair employment practices act. The term “disability” has the same meaning as that term is defined in § 42-87-1, and the terms, as used regarding persons with disabilities, “auxiliary aids and services,” “readily achievable,” “reasonable accommodation,” “reasonable modification,” and “undue hardship” shall have the same meaning as those terms are defined in § 42-87-1.1.

(e) For the purposes of this section, the term:

(1) “Protective hairstyles” means and includes, but is not limited to, hair texture or hairstyles, if that hair texture or that hairstyle is commonly associated with a particular race or national origin (including a hairstyle in which hair is tightly coiled or tightly curled, locks, cornrows, twists, braids, Bantu knots, and Afros).

(2) “Race” means and includes traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.

(f) For purposes of this section, the term “anti-Semitism” means:

(1) The definition of anti-Semitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which has been adopted by the United States Department of State;

(2) Contemporary examples of anti-Semitism identified by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance; and

(3) Does not include criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country.

(g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to:

(1) Diminish or infringe upon any rights protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or Article I of the Rhode Island State Constitution; or

(2) Conflict with federal or state discrimination laws.

(h) In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a specific instance of discrimination that violates a state law prohibiting discrimination or is otherwise subject to the authority of the commission, the state, any of its agencies, or local subdivisions of state agencies, shall take into consideration the definition of anti-Semitism for purposes of determining whether the instance of discrimination was motivated by anti-Semitic intent.

(i) A discriminatory act includes any harassing conduct that is so severe, pervasive, or persistent as to interfere with or limit the ability of the victim to participate in or benefit from any service, activity, opportunity, or privilege.

SECTION 4. This act shall take effect upon passage.