Skip to main content
S 2174Labor Relations

Labor and Labor Relations - Labor Relations Act - No Limitation on Healthcare Benefit Providers

This bill allows public employee unions to specify exactly which health insurance company their employer must use in their contracts.

Introduced29 Yea7 Nay2 Not voting
Population
Affected
25
Email Legislator
Introduced Jan 16, 2026Committee Senate Labor & Gaming

Plain-English Summary

This legislation repeals a section of the Rhode Island Labor Relations Act. Currently, the law prohibits collective bargaining agreements for state employees, teachers, and municipal workers from mandating a specific health insurance provider. The existing law also bans writing technical requirements that effectively limit the choice to a single provider. By repealing this section, this bill restores the ability of public sector unions and employers to negotiate and specify exactly which health insurance carrier must be used in their contracts.

For younger readers

Right now, there is a rule that says when public workers, like teachers or town employees, make a deal with the government about their jobs, they cannot force the government to buy health insurance from just one specific company. They have to let different companies try to offer the best price. This bill removes that rule. If this bill passes, workers can demand that the government buy insurance from a specific company they like, instead of having to look at all the options.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
State employeesPublic school teachersMunicipal employeesHealth insurance providersTaxpayers
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Restores full collective bargaining rights to public sector unions, allowing workers to negotiate for the specific healthcare networks and providers they trust and prefer without legislative interference.
  • Prevents public employers from forcing employees onto inferior health plans solely to cut costs, ensuring that worker health and continuity of care are prioritized over the lowest bid.
  • Empowers organized labor to leverage their collective buying power to demand better service and accountability from specific insurance carriers.
  • Could lead to higher healthcare costs for municipalities and the state, potentially diverting limited funds away from other critical social services or education funding.
  • May entrench dominant corporate insurance carriers, reducing competition in the marketplace and potentially making it harder for non-profit or alternative cooperative models to enter the sector.
  • Removing competitive bidding requirements could decrease transparency in government spending, theoretically allowing for less accountability regarding how tax dollars are allocated to private corporations.
For Conservatives
  • Removes a state-level regulation, theoretically returning more decision-making authority to local municipalities regarding how they structure their own contracts.
  • Eliminates government interference in the free market of contract negotiations, allowing parties to agree to terms without legislative micromanagement.
  • Reduces the size of the statutory code by repealing an existing restriction, aligning with the general principle of simplifying state laws.
  • Empowers public sector unions to dictate specific vendors to the government, likely increasing the cost of government and the burden on taxpayers.
  • Eliminates competitive bidding safeguards, preventing the free market from driving down costs and ensuring the best value for public funds.
  • Creates an environment ripe for cronyism where unions can steer lucrative government contracts to specific insurance companies in exchange for political support.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 6 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 28-7-49 of the General Laws in Chapter 28-7 entitled "Labor Relations Act" is hereby repealed. 28-7-49. No limitation on healthcare benefit providers. No collective bargaining agreement covering any group or groups of state employees, public school teachers, or employees of any city or town, ratified after August 1, 2008, shall specify that an employer must procure a healthcare benefit plan from a specific provider of such plans. The technical qualifications of the healthcare benefit plan, to be contracted for, shall not be framed or constructed in a manner designed to identify an exclusive provider of said healthcare services.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.