Skip to main content
H 8281Cities & Towns

Towns and Cities - Zoning Ordinances

This bill updates rules for inclusionary zoning, regulating density bonuses, fee-in-lieu calculations, and mandating towns use housing funds within three years.

Held for study
Population
Affected
45
Introduced Mar 11, 2026Committee House Municipal Government & Housing

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends Rhode Island's zoning laws regarding "inclusionary zoning," which requires developers to include affordable housing in new projects. It mandates that if a town requires affordable housing, at least 15% of the units must be affordable for a minimum of 30 years. It prevents towns from restricting single-family homes to fewer than three bedrooms. The bill clarifies "density bonuses" (allowing extra market-rate units) but specifies that developers who choose to pay a fee instead of building affordable units are not eligible for these bonuses. It also mandates that towns spend collected fees on housing within three years or forfeit the funds to the state.

For younger readers

When people build new neighborhoods, the government sometimes makes them build houses that cost less money so more people can afford to live there. This new rule says that if a builder chooses to pay money to the town instead of building these cheaper houses right there, they do not get special permission to build extra houses. It also says the town has to spend that money on cheaper housing within three years. If the town waits too long, the state government takes the money to make sure it gets used to help people find homes.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Real Estate DevelopersMunicipal Planning BoardsLow-Income FamiliesConstruction CompaniesTown Councils
Impacted communities
All, Smithfield

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
Amount unknown

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Prevents municipalities from hoarding affordable housing funds by mandating that fees collected must be spent within three years or turned over to the state for immediate use.
  • Prohibits developers from "double-dipping" by denying them lucrative density bonuses if they choose to pay a fee rather than actually building the affordable housing units on-site.
  • Prevents exclusionary zoning tactics by forbidding municipalities from limiting single-family affordable applications to fewer than three bedrooms, ensuring housing is available for families with children.
  • Allows the wealthy town of Smithfield a special exemption to determine its own density bonuses, creating an inequitable application of the law compared to other communities.
  • Continues to permit a "fee-in-lieu" option, allowing developers to buy their way out of building integrated affordable housing, which can perpetuate economic segregation.
  • While it mandates a 15% affordable threshold, the density bonus structure essentially subsidizes market-rate development, potentially leading to gentrification or over-development without sufficient deep-subsidy units.
For Conservatives
  • Preserves the right of developers to choose a "fee-in-lieu" option rather than being forced to construct affordable units they do not wish to manage or build.
  • Protects the specific home-rule authority of the Town of Smithfield by allowing it to determine its own density bonuses unlike other municipalities.
  • Standardizes the calculation for fees based on clear economic data (HUD income limits and RIHMFC costs), providing predictability for business owners and developers.
  • Authorizes the state government to seize locally collected fees from municipal accounts if not spent within three years, violating local fiscal autonomy and home rule.
  • Strips towns of the ability to regulate their own community character and school density by prohibiting them from limiting bedroom counts in new developments.
  • Penalizes developers who choose the legal "fee-in-lieu" option by stripping them of density bonuses, effectively increasing the regulatory burden and cost of doing business.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 4 additions

SECTION 1. Section 45-24-46.1 of the General Laws in Chapter 45-24 entitled "Zoning Ordinances" is hereby amended to read as follows: 45-24-46.1. Inclusionary zoning.

(a) A zoning ordinance requiring the inclusion of affordable housing as part of a development shall provide that the housing will be affordable housing, as defined in § 42-128- 8.1(d)(1); that the affordable housing will constitute not less than fifteen percent (15%) of the total units proposed for the development; and that the units will remain affordable for a period of not less than thirty (30) years from initial occupancy enforced through a land lease and/or deed restriction enforceable by the municipality and the state of Rhode Island. A zoning ordinance that requires the inclusion of affordable housing as part of a development shall specify the threshold in which the inclusion of affordable housing is required, but in no event shall a minimum threshold triggering the inclusion of affordable housing be higher than ten (10) dwelling units. The total number of units for the development may include less than fifteen percent (15%) affordable units after the density bonus described in subsection (c) of this section is determined. A municipality shall not limit the number of bedrooms for applications submitted under this section to anything less than three (3) bedrooms per dwelling unit for single-family dwelling units.

(b) A zoning ordinance that includes inclusionary zoning may provide that the affordable housing must be built on-site or it may allow for one or more alternative methods of production, including, but not limited to: off-site construction or rehabilitation; donation of land suitable for development of the required affordable units; and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the construction or provision of affordable housing units.

(c) Density bonus, zoning incentives, and municipal subsidies. For all projects subject to inclusionary zoning, subject to applicable setback, lot width, or frontage requirements or the granting of relief from the same, a municipality shall allow the addition of one market rate unit for each affordable unit required and the minimum lot area per dwelling unit normally required in the applicable zoning district shall be reduced by that amount necessary to accommodate the development. Larger density bonuses for the provision of an increased percentage of affordable housing in a development may be provided by a municipality in the zoning ordinance. The total number of units for the development shall equal the number originally proposed, including the required affordable units, plus the additional units that constitute the density bonus. Local regulations shall provide for reasonable relief from dimensional requirements to accommodate the bonus density under this section. A municipality shall provide, and an applicant may request, additional zoning incentives and/or municipal government subsidies as defined in § 45-53-3 to offset differential costs of affordable units. Available zoning incentives and municipal government subsidies may be listed in the zoning ordinance, but shall not be an exclusive list. Notwithstanding any provisions of this section, the town of Smithfield shall be allowed to determine its density bonuses based upon its underlying zoning.

(1) Inclusionary zoning requirements shall not be applied where there is a limitation on the development density at the subject property under the regulations of a state agency, such as the coastal resources management council or department of environmental management that prevents the use of the density bonus set forth in this section.

(d) Fee-in-lieu. To the extent a municipality provides an option for the payment of a fee- in-lieu of the construction or provision of affordable housing, and an application seeks to utilize fee-in-lieu, the use of such fee shall be the choice of the developer or builder applied on a per-unit basis and may be used for new developments, purchasing property and/or homes, rehabilitating properties, or any other manner that creates additional low- or moderate-income housing as defined in § 45-53-3(9).

(1) Eligibility for density bonus. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, an application that utilizes a fee-in-lieu, off-site construction or rehabilitation, or donation of land suitable for development of the required affordable units shall not be eligible for the density bonus outlined in this section.

(2) An application that seeks to utilize a fee-in-lieu of the construction or provision of affordable housing must be reviewed by the planning board or commission and is not eligible for administrative review under the Rhode Island Land Development and Subdivision Review Enabling Act of 1992, codified at §§ 45-23-25 — 45-23-74.

(3) Amount of fee-in-lieu. For affordable single-family homes and condominium units, the per-unit fee shall be the difference between the maximum affordable sales price for a family of four (4) earning eighty percent (80%) of the area median income as determined annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the average cost of developing a single unit of affordable housing. The average cost of developing a single unit of affordable housing shall be determined annually based on the average, per-unit development cost of affordable homes financed by Rhode Island housing and mortgage finance corporation (RIHMFC) over the previous three (3) years, excluding existing units that received preservation financing.

(i) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(3) of this section, in no case shall the per-unit fee for affordable single-family homes and condominium units be less than forty thousand dollars ($40,000).

(4) Use of fee-in-lieu. The municipality shall deposit all in-lieu payments into restricted accounts that shall be allocated and spent only for the creation and development of affordable housing within the municipality serving individuals or families at or below eighty percent (80%) of the area median income. The municipality shall maintain a local affordable housing board to oversee the funds in the restricted accounts and shall allocate the funds within three (3) years of collection. The municipality shall include in the housing element of their local comprehensive plan and shall pass by ordinance, the process it will use to allocate the funds.

(e) As an alternative to the provisions of subsection (d), the municipality may elect to transfer in-lieu payments promptly upon receipt or within the three-year (3) period after receipt. A municipality shall transfer all fee-in-lieu payments that are not allocated within three (3) years of collection, including funds held as of July 1, 2025, to the executive office of housing for the purpose of developing affordable housing within that community. Funds shall be deposited into the Housing Production Fund established pursuant to § 42-128-2.1.

(f) [Deleted by P.L. 2025, ch. 278, art. 9, § 16.]

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.