Skip to main content
H 8118Police & Prisons

State Affairs and Government - Law Enforcement Officers' Due Process, Accountability, and Transparency Act

Requires both the police department and the accused officer to agree before a disciplinary hearing committee can hire legal counsel.

Held for study
Population
Affected
8
Introduced Feb 27, 2026Committee House Judiciary

Plain-English Summary

This legislation modifies the "Law Enforcement Officers’ Due Process, Accountability, and Transparency Act" regarding disciplinary hearings for police officers. Specifically, it changes the rules for how a hearing committee can hire a lawyer to assist them. Under the new bill, the committee can only appoint legal counsel if both the police department and the accused officer agree to it in writing. Additionally, the bill mandates that the cost of this legal counsel must be split 50/50 between the department and the officer, unless they agree to a different payment arrangement.

For younger readers

When a police officer gets in trouble at work, a special group called a committee holds a meeting to decide what should happen. Sometimes, this committee wants to hire a lawyer to help them understand the rules. This new law says the committee is not allowed to hire a lawyer unless two people say it is okay: the police department and the officer who is in trouble. Also, if they do hire a lawyer, the police department and the officer must share the cost of paying the lawyer equally.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Police OfficersMunicipal Police DepartmentsState PoliceHearing Committee MembersPolice Unions
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Protects individual workers (officers) from potential financial exploitation by removing the chairperson's ability to unilaterally assign more than 50% of legal fees to the accused.
  • Encourages a consensus-based approach to disciplinary proceedings by requiring mutual agreement between labor and management regarding procedural support.
  • Prevents the unnecessary expenditure of public funds on outside legal counsel for hearing committees unless all parties deem it absolutely necessary.
  • Undermines police accountability by giving an accused officer veto power over the hearing committee's ability to access independent legal advice.
  • Weakens the independence of the oversight body (the hearing committee) by making its resources dependent on the consent of the parties it is supposed to be judging.
  • May lead to less effective disciplinary hearings if the committee, which includes laypersons, cannot navigate complex legal issues because the accused officer refused to allow counsel.
For Conservatives
  • Protects police officers from potential administrative overreach by ensuring a hearing committee cannot hire expensive counsel without the officer's consent.
  • Limits government spending by restricting the ability of appointed committees to incur legal fees without the explicit agreement of the agency paying the bill.
  • Ensures fair financial treatment for officers by codifying a 50/50 split on legal fees, preventing the state from assigning the full financial burden to the individual.
  • Could hamper "Law and Order" efforts to remove bad police officers if the disciplinary committee is unable to get the legal guidance needed to uphold a termination.
  • Reduces the authority and discretion of the committee Chairperson (a retired judge) to manage the proceedings as they see fit.
  • May cause procedural delays or mistrials in disciplinary cases if legal questions arise that the committee cannot answer, ultimately wasting taxpayer resources.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 7 additions · 8 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 42-28.6-1 of the General Laws in Chapter 42-28.6 entitled "Law Enforcement Officers’ Due Process, Accountability, and Transparency Act" is hereby amended to read as follows: 42-28.6-1. Definitions — Payment of legal fees. As used in this chapter, the following words have the meanings indicated:

(1) “Course of training in police discipline” means a course or courses of instruction approved by the Rhode Island police officers commission on standards and training (“commission”) which shall be taught by instructors approved by the commission regarding the provisions of this chapter and the applicable procedure, evidence and rules that apply to police discipline as provided pursuant to § 42-28.6-1.2.

(2) “Hearing” means any meeting in the course of an investigatory proceeding, other than an interrogation at which no testimony is taken under oath, conducted by a hearing committee for the purpose of taking or adducing testimony or receiving evidence. (3)(i) “Hearing committee” means a committee acting as a deliberative body which is authorized to hold a hearing on a complaint against a law enforcement officer and which consists of five (5) members: one member appointed by the chief justice of the supreme court who shall be a retired justice or judge of the supreme, superior, or district court; one member appointed by the chief justice of the supreme court, who is a practicing attorney in good standing with the supreme court, in consultation with the court’s committee on racial and ethnic fairness and the Rhode Island Bar Association and its committee on diversity, equity, and inclusion; and three (3) active or retired qualified law enforcement officers employed by or retired from the state police or a municipal law enforcement agency from within the state of Rhode Island, who shall be selected at random by the Rhode Island police officers commission on standards and training from the certified officer pool established pursuant to § 42-28.6-1.1 at an open meeting pursuant to chapter 46 of this title. No law enforcement officer shall be selected that is employed by or retired from the same law enforcement agency that employs the accused law enforcement officer or who is employed by or retired from the charging law enforcement agency. The retired justice or judge appointed by the chief justice of the supreme court shall serve as chairperson of the hearing committee. Upon written application by a majority of the hearing committee, the chairperson, in their discretion, may also appoint legal counsel to assist the hearing committee.

(ii) The law enforcement agency and the accused law enforcement officer under investigation shall each be responsible to pay fifty percent (50%) of the legal fee of the appointed legal counsel for the hearing committee; provided, however, that on motion made by either party, the chair of the hearing committee shall have the authority to make a different disposition as to what each party is required to pay toward the appointed legal counsel’s legal fee. Upon written application by both the law enforcement agency and the accused law enforcement officer, the chairperson, in their discretion, may also appoint legal counsel to assist the hearing committee. In such cases, the law enforcement agency and the accused law enforcement officer shall each be responsible to pay fifty percent (50%) of the legal fee of the appointed legal counsel for the hearing committee, unless otherwise agreed upon.

(4) “Law enforcement officer” means any permanently employed city or town police officer, state police officer, permanent law enforcement officer of the department of environmental management, or those employees of the airport corporation of Rhode Island who have been granted the authority to arrest by the president and CEO of said corporation. However this shall not include the chief of police and/or the highest ranking sworn officer of any of the departments including the president and CEO of the airport corporation of Rhode Island.

(5) “Qualified law enforcement officer” means:

(i) A sworn law enforcement officer who:

(A) Has a minimum of five (5) years’ active service as a law enforcement officer with a law enforcement agency within the state;

(B) Has successfully completed a course(s) of training in police discipline pursuant to this chapter and has maintained a current certification of completed training; and

(C) Has not achieved the rank of chief, colonel, deputy chief, or lieutenant colonel;

(ii) A retired law enforcement officer who has qualified prior to retirement or during retirement and has met the criteria set out herein.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.