Skip to main content
H 7967Labor Relations

Labor and Labor Relations - Labor Relations Act - No Limitation on Healthcare Benefit Providers

Repeals the law prohibiting public employee union contracts from mandating a specific health insurance company.

Held for study
Population
Affected
25
Email Legislator
Introduced Feb 27, 2026Committee House Labor

Plain-English Summary

This legislation repeals a specific section of Rhode Island labor law that currently restricts public sector collective bargaining. Under the existing law, agreements covering state employees, public school teachers, and municipal employees cannot mandate the use of a specific healthcare insurance provider, nor can they craft technical requirements that only one provider could meet. By repealing this section, this bill restores the ability of public sector unions and employers to negotiate and specify a particular insurance carrier in their contracts.

For younger readers

There are rules about how the government and workers like teachers or town employees agree on things like their pay and health insurance. Right now, there is a rule that says they are not allowed to pick just one specific insurance company for everyone; they have to leave it open for different companies to offer plans. This bill removes that rule. This means that in the future, the workers and the government can agree to pick exactly one specific company for their health insurance if they want to.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
State EmployeesPublic School TeachersMunicipal EmployeesHealth Insurance ProvidersTaxpayers
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Restores full collective bargaining rights to workers, allowing unions to negotiate all aspects of their compensation, including the specific vendors used for healthcare benefits.
  • Empowers unions to select insurance providers that may offer superior labor practices, better networks, or non-profit structures, rather than being forced to accept the lowest bidder.
  • Strengthens the position of labor organizations by removing state-imposed limitations on what can be discussed and agreed upon during contract negotiations.
  • May reduce competition among insurance providers, potentially leading to higher premiums that strain public budgets and reduce funds available for other social services.
  • Could entrench large, dominant insurance corporations by allowing them to secure exclusive contracts, hurting smaller competitors and reducing overall market innovation.
  • Risk of prioritizing brand loyalty to a specific insurer over the actual quality or breadth of coverage provided to the workers.
For Conservatives
  • Reduces the size of the state legal code by repealing a specific government regulation and restriction on the contracting process.
  • Restores the freedom of contract in a literal sense, allowing two parties (the employer and the union) to agree to terms without specific legislative interference regarding vendors.
  • Allows local municipalities more autonomy to negotiate contracts as they see fit, rather than having the state dictate the terms of the bidding process.
  • Eliminates competitive bidding requirements for healthcare plans, likely leading to higher costs for taxpayers as unions demand expensive, specific providers.
  • Increases the power of public sector unions to dictate government spending and vendor selection, potentially leading to cronyism between unions and specific insurance carriers.
  • Removes a taxpayer protection that ensured government contracts were based on technical qualifications rather than favoritism toward a specific "exclusive provider."

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 6 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 28-7-49 of the General Laws in Chapter 28-7 entitled "Labor Relations Act" is hereby repealed. 28-7-49. No limitation on healthcare benefit providers. No collective bargaining agreement covering any group or groups of state employees, public school teachers, or employees of any city or town, ratified after August 1, 2008, shall specify that an employer must procure a healthcare benefit plan from a specific provider of such plans. The technical qualifications of the healthcare benefit plan, to be contracted for, shall not be framed or constructed in a manner designed to identify an exclusive provider of said healthcare services.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.