Skip to main content
H 7548Civil Procedure

Courts and Civil Procedure - Procedure Generally - Evidence

This bill prevents a healthcare provider's apology or expression of sympathy from being used as evidence of guilt in lawsuits.

Held for study
Population
Affected
15
Introduced Feb 6, 2026Committee House Judiciary

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends Rhode Island's evidence laws regarding medical malpractice cases. It establishes that if a healthcare provider (such as a doctor or hospital staff) expresses apology, sympathy, or regret to a patient or their family regarding an unexpected medical outcome or injury, those statements cannot be used in court as an admission of liability. However, if the provider makes a specific statement admitting to fault, negligence, or a mistake, that specific admission can still be used as evidence against them, even if it was part of an apology.

For younger readers

Sometimes, when a person gets hurt at the doctor's office, the doctor might feel bad and say "I'm sorry" or "I wish this didn't happen." This bill says that if a doctor says nice words like that to a patient or their family, the patient cannot use those words in court to prove the doctor did something wrong. It allows doctors to be kind without getting in trouble. However, if the doctor specifically says, "I made a mistake," that can still be used to show they were wrong.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Healthcare Providers (Doctors, Nurses)PatientsHospitals and Healthcare FacilitiesMedical Malpractice AttorneysLiability Insurance Companies
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Encourages more compassionate and human interactions between healthcare providers and patients, fostering a supportive environment for families dealing with medical trauma.
  • May reduce "defensive medicine" practices where doctors avoid communication for fear of lawsuits, potentially lowering overall healthcare costs for the community.
  • Allows for emotional closure for patients and families by permitting doctors to express empathy and regret without the immediate threat of legal retaliation.
  • Could disadvantage victims of medical malpractice by excluding potential evidence, making it harder for injured patients to prove liability against powerful healthcare institutions.
  • Creates a legal "grey area" that corporate lawyers might exploit to shield providers who were actually negligent but phrase their admissions carefully as "regret."
  • May result in fewer successful lawsuits for low-income plaintiffs who rely on clear admissions of guilt to secure legal representation and justice.
For Conservatives
  • Protects healthcare professionals and businesses from frivolous lawsuits based merely on polite expressions of sympathy or human decency.
  • Likely to reduce medical liability insurance premiums by limiting the scope of evidence in malpractice suits, supporting the business viability of medical practices.
  • Restores a sense of fairness to the legal system by ensuring that an act of kindness isn't weaponized into an admission of guilt.
  • Interferes with the judicial process by legislating what evidence a court can and cannot consider, rather than letting the adversarial system determine the truth.
  • Could be viewed as shielding incompetent professionals from personal responsibility and the consequences of their errors.
  • Complicates the rule of law by requiring courts to parse single conversations into "admissible" and "inadmissible" parts, potentially slowing down legal proceedings.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 33 additions

SECTION 1. Chapter 9-19 of the General Laws entitled "Evidence" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following section: 9-19-45. Statements or conduct expressing apology, regret, condolence by health care provider -- Admissibility.

(a) For the purposes of this section, the following words shall have the following meanings:

(1) "Healthcare facility" means any institutional health service provider licensed pursuant to the provisions of chapter 17 of title 23.

(2) "Healthcare provider" or "provider" shall have the same meaning as the meaning contained in § 5-37.3-3.

(3) "Relative" means a patient's spouse, parent, grandparent, stepparent, child, grandchild, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, uncle, aunt, adopted children of parent, or spouse's parents, whether by whole or half blood, adoption or marriage.

(4) "Representative" means a legal guardian, attorney, health care representative or any person recognized in law or custom as a patient's agent.

(5) "Unanticipated outcome" means the outcome of a medical treatment or procedure that differs from an expected result of such medical treatment or procedure.

(b) In any claim, complaint or civil action brought against a healthcare facility or provider by or on behalf of a patient allegedly experiencing an unanticipated outcome, or in any arbitration proceeding or other method of alternative dispute resolution that relates to the claim, complaint or civil action, and in any judicial or administrative proceeding against a healthcare facility or provider, the following shall be inadmissible as evidence of an admission of liability or as evidence of an admission against interest:

(1) Any and all statements, affirmations, gestures, writings, activities or conduct expressing apology, benevolence, commiseration, condolence, compassion, regret, sympathy, or a general sense of concern which are made by a healthcare facility, a healthcare provider, or an employee or agent of a healthcare facility or provider, to the patient, the patient's relative, or a representative of the patient which relate to any alleged discomfort, pain, suffering, injury, or death of the patient as a result of the unanticipated outcome.

(2) This section shall not apply to a statement of fault, liability, negligence, or culpable conduct that is part of or made in addition to a statement, affirmation, gesture, writing, activity, or conduct described in subsection (b)(1) of this section, and only the expression of apology, benevolence, commiseration, condolence, compassion, regret, sympathy, or a general sense of concern made under subsection (b)(1) of this section is inadmissible.

(3) Any statement, affirmation, gesture, writing, activity, or conduct described in subsection (b)(1) of this section is admissible for any other purpose.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.