Skip to main content
H 7499Government

State Affairs and Government - Rhode Island Department of Transportation Efficiency and Performance Audit Act

Legislation requiring an independent performance and efficiency audit of the RI Department of Transportation, to be completed by January 2027.

Held for study
Population
Affected
65
Introduced Feb 4, 2026Committee House State Government & Elections

Plain-English Summary

This bill mandates that the Rhode Island Department of Administration (DOA) commission an independent efficiency and performance audit of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT). The audit must be conducted by an entity with expertise in transportation systems and infrastructure finance. It requires benchmarking RIDOT’s performance against 5 to 10 similar "peer states" regarding costs, project delivery, and safety outcomes. The audit will examine areas such as workforce structure, consultant usage, and maintenance efficiency. A final report is due to the Governor and General Assembly by January 1, 2027, and must be made public.

For younger readers

This law says that the state government must hire a group of experts to check up on the Department of Transportation, which is the group that takes care of roads and bridges. These experts will look at how money is spent, how fast construction projects get done, and if there are enough workers to do the job. They will compare Rhode Island's work to other states that are similar to see if we are doing a good job. A report on what they find must be finished by the beginning of 2027 so everyone can read it.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
TaxpayersRIDOT EmployeesEngineering ConsultantsConstruction ContractorsMotorists
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Increases transparency and accountability within a major state department by mandating a public report on spending, safety outcomes, and project management.
  • Examines the ratio of in-house staff to private consultants, potentially highlighting the need to strengthen the public sector workforce rather than relying on outsourcing.
  • Includes safety outcomes, such as fatalities per vehicle mile traveled, as a key metric, prioritizing the physical well-being of the community over purely financial metrics.
  • Allocates public funds toward an external audit firm rather than directly funding transportation improvements, social services, or public transit infrastructure.
  • The focus on "efficiency" and "cost per lane-mile" could be used to justify future budget cuts or austerity measures that reduce service quality for the public.
  • The timeline for the audit (due in 2027) delays immediate systemic reforms that might be necessary to address current transportation inequities.
For Conservatives
  • Promotes fiscal responsibility by scrutinizing cost overruns, financial forecasting accuracy, and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars within the Department of Transportation.
  • Utilizes peer state benchmarking to introduce competition and comparative metrics, ensuring the state is not underperforming compared to similar jurisdictions.
  • Investigates the "administrative overhead ratio" and consultant utilization, potentially identifying government bloat or waste that can be eliminated.
  • Expands government bureaucracy by requiring one state department (DOA) to oversee and audit another (RIDOT), rather than reducing the size of government.
  • Requires the expenditure of additional taxpayer funds to pay for an external consultant to perform the audit, increasing state spending.
  • Does not grant immediate authority to fire underperforming officials or cut funding, potentially resulting in a report that offers suggestions without enforcing consequences.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 91 additions

SECTION 1. Title 42 of the General Laws entitled "STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: 42-13.2-1. Definitions. As used in this chapter:

(1) “Department” means the Rhode Island department of transportation.

(2) “DOA” means the Rhode Island department of administration.

(3) “Audit” means an independent efficiency and performance audit conducted in accordance with this chapter.

(4) “Peer state” means a state transportation agency selected for benchmarking based on geography, climate, system size, and procurement framework.

(5) “Responsible charge” means the full-time employee of the department to be in responsible charge of the project pursuant to the provisions of 23 C.F.R §635.105. 42-13.2-2. Requirement to commission efficiency and performance audit.

(a) The DOA shall commission an independent efficiency and performance audit of the department.

(b) The audit shall be performed by an entity with demonstrated expertise in transportation systems, infrastructure finance, and public-sector performance benchmarking.

(c) The audit shall be completed and delivered to the governor and the general assembly on or before January 1, 2027. 42-13.2-3. Scope of audit.

(a) The audit shall include, but not be limited to, the following areas:

(1) Project delivery efficiency, including schedule adherence, cost escalation trends, change orders, procurement cycle time, and delivery outcomes;

(2) Asset management, including pavement, bridges, culverts, intelligent transportation systems assets, backlog replacement needs, and lifecycle cost analysis;

(3) Workforce and organizational structure, including ratio of in-house staff to consultants, vacancy rates, engineering capacity, and impacts on project delivery and oversight;

(4) Maintenance efficiency, including cost per lane-mile, snow and ice operations productivity, maintenance productivity, and equipment utilization;

(5) Financial management, including forecasting accuracy, cash-flow controls, use and tracking of federal funds, and alignment with the state transportation improvement program (STIP) and transportation improvement program (TIP); and

(6) Governance and oversight, including internal controls, performance reporting, transparency practices, and compliance with responsible charge requirements.

(b) The audit pursuant to this section shall be separate and independent of any audit conducted by the auditor general pursuant to chapter 13 of title 22 (“auditor general”). 42-13.2-4. Peer state benchmarking.

(a) The audit shall identify not fewer than five (5), nor more than ten (10) peer states matched on geography, climate, system size, and procurement rules to evaluate and compare against the department’s performance.

(b) The audit shall benchmark the department’s performance using comparable metrics including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) Cost metrics;

(i) Cost per lane-mile (maintenance and capital separately);

(ii) Bridge cost per square foot (new construction and rehabilitation);

(iii) Administrative overhead ratio;

(iv) Consultant utilization rate; and

(v) Percentage of projects with cost overruns exceeding ten percent (10%).

(2) Performance metrics:

(i) Pavement condition metrics, including international roughness index or pavement condition rating;

(ii) Bridge condition metrics, including percentage structurally deficient or in poor condition;

(iii) Project delivery cycle time for design, procurement, and construction;

(iv) Snow and ice response metrics, including materials used per lane-mile and response times; and

(v) Safety outcomes, including fatalities per vehicle mile traveled. 42-13.2-5. Procurement and contracting practices. The audit conducted pursuant to § 42-13.2-2 shall evaluate procurement and contracting practices including, but not limited to:

(1) Consultant procurement processes, including qualifications-based selection and cost negotiation;

(2) Oversight of consultant hours and costs;

(3) Compliance with federal responsible charge requirements;

(4) Use of alternative delivery methods, including design-build, construction manager/general contractor, and public-private partnerships; and

(5) Change order governance, approval thresholds, root-cause analysis, and systemic trends. 42-13.2-6. Workforce capacity and outsourcing strategy. The audit conducted pursuant to § 42-13.2-2, shall assess workforce capacity and outsourcing strategy, including:

(1) Ratio of in-house engineering full-time equivalents to consultant engineering resources;

(2) Vacancy rates and operational impacts;

(3) Compliance with federal responsible charge staffing expectations; and

(4) Training programs, succession planning, and technical certification. 42-13.2-7. Maintenance and operations efficiency. The audit conducted pursuant to § 42-13.2-2 shall assess maintenance and operations efficiency, including:

(1) Cost per lane-mile by district;

(2) Salt and chemical usage normalized by lane-mile and weather severity;

(3) Vehicle and equipment availability and downtime;

(4) Maintenance backlog tracking; and

(5) Overtime utilization and patterns. 42-13.2-8. Reporting and public availability.

(a) Upon completion, the audit shall be submitted to:

(1) The governor;

(2) The president of the senate;

(3) The speaker of the house of representatives; and

(4) The chairs of the house and senate finance committees.

(b) The final audit report shall be made publicly available on the DOA’s website. 42-13.2-9. Cooperation and access to records. The department shall cooperate fully with the audit and provide access to all records, data, contracts, and personnel reasonably necessary to complete the audit.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.