Skip to main content
H 7464Public Transit

Public Utilities and Carriers - Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

This bill prohibits using state funds after August 1, 2026, for the current project to relocate the Providence bus hub.

Introduced
Population
Affected
35
Introduced Jan 30, 2026Committee House Finance

Plain-English Summary

This legislation prevents the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA) from using state funds or trust funds to proceed with the current plan to relocate the central bus hub from Kennedy Plaza in Providence. Specifically, it prohibits spending money after August 1, 2026, on any work related to the "transit center joint development project" Request for Proposals from January 2023 or the subsequent service agreement signed in February 2024. The bill effectively cancels the funding for the proposed hub relocation, citing high costs and negative impacts on riders.

For younger readers

There is a main bus station in Providence called Kennedy Plaza where many buses meet. The people in charge of the buses (RIPTA) wanted to build a new station in a different place. This bill stops them from doing that. It says that after August 1, 2026, the state will not let RIPTA use money to pay for the new station plan. The lawmakers think the new plan costs too much money and that the people who ride the bus like the station where it is now. This keeps the bus station at Kennedy Plaza for now.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
Bus ridersRhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA)TaxpayersConstruction contractorsDowntown Providence businesses
Impacted communities
Providence

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Protects public transit riders, many of whom are low-income or working-class, from a relocation plan that would force unnecessary transfers and increase commute times.
  • Prevents public funds from being funneled into a corporate contract that guarantees profit margins without a maximum price cap, safeguarding taxpayer money for actual social services.
  • Ensures that the central transit hub remains in a location that is convenient for the community and connects directly to major downtown destinations, maintaining accessibility for those without cars.
  • Could delay necessary upgrades or modernization of the transit infrastructure if the current facility is deemed inadequate and no alternative plan is immediately available to replace the cancelled one.
  • Might result in sunk costs regarding the millions of dollars already spent on the preliminary design and planning phases of the relocation project.
  • Risk of political gridlock halting transit development entirely, potentially leaving riders with deteriorating facilities while new plans are debated for years.
For Conservatives
  • Blocks a government project estimated to cost hundreds of millions of dollars, preventing potential waste of taxpayer funds on an expensive construction plan that lacks a price cap.
  • Stops a contract arrangement that offered guaranteed profit margins to vendors regardless of total cost, enforcing better fiscal discipline and accountability on a public authority.
  • Halts a bureaucratic initiative that lacked sufficient financial safeguards, preventing the state from entering into open-ended financial commitments that would burden future budgets.
  • Represents legislative interference in the management decisions of a semi-autonomous public authority, potentially setting a precedent for micromanagement of agency contracts.
  • Could lead to legal challenges or contract dispute costs if the private vendors involved seek damages for the termination of the project agreements.
  • Delays potential infrastructure development which might have stimulated construction jobs and private sector involvement in the proposed development zone.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 8 additions

SECTION 1. The general assembly finds and declares that:

(1) The proposed relocation of the Providence bus hub is widely opposed by Rhode Islanders who use the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (RIPTA);

(2) The project to relocate the Providence bus hub was projected, in a December 2022 cost estimate provided to the RIPTA board's finance subcommittee, to have an overall cost of between $200,000,000 and $250,000,000;

(3) RIPTA is in serious financial difficulties and would have trouble affording even a fraction of that cost estimate, which is only an estimate;

(4) Subsequently, in January 2023, RIPTA made a Request for Proposals (RFP) to potential contractors for the Providence hub relocation, in which RIPTA specified that the bids in response to the RFP could name the profit margin that the vendor would get for work including final design, building of the facility, and operation services for the yet-to-be-constructed hub;

(5) In February 2024, RIPTA signed a Preliminary Services Agreement to pay a vendor up to $16.9 million for work including public communications, initial design, and assistance in selecting a potential site for a relocated bus hub;

(6) This Preliminary Services Agreement describes many details of how this vendor's potential ensuing contract with RIPTA (for final design, building of the facility, and operation services for the yet-to-be-constructed hub) will look like, and in particular it specifies that this potential ensuing contract with the vendor would grant the vendor the same profit margin that the vendor asked for in its response to the RFP;

(7) Big contracts with a guaranteed profit margin and no maximum price are dangerous for the taxpayer;

(8) RIPTA has taken no steps, either in the RFP or subsequently, to ensure that there is an enforceable maximum price for this hub relocation project;

(9) It is not in the state's interest for RIPTA, with its financial difficulties, to enter into a subsequent contract where the vendor gets the guaranteed profit margin it asked for on top of whatever the vendor's costs or expected costs turn out to be, where these costs are likely to be in the hundreds of millions;

(10) The existing Kennedy Plaza bus hub is located at the site where many of Providence's major streets converge, which is convenient for buses and riders alike, and Kennedy Plaza could be renovated for a fraction of the hundreds of millions of dollars that it would likely cost to relocate the hub;

(11) Most bus riders who get off the bus in Kennedy Plaza are doing so not to transfer to another bus but to get to nearby destinations;

(12) If the Providence hub was relocated, many of these bus riders who have their final destination in the Kennedy Plaza area would have to transfer buses at the new hub, forcing them to take an additional unnecessary bus trip;

(13) The only contract currently in effect with the vendor, the Preliminary Services Agreement, has an off-ramp provision that allows RIPTA to terminate it at any time without paying for any not-yet-done work;

(14) However, RIPTA’s RFP and its other legal agreements failed to specify that RIPTA has any off-ramp rights once a subsequent contract is signed;

(15) It is in the state's best interest for RIPTA to exercise its option to terminate the Preliminary Services Agreement so that any further work done on the Providence bus hub is done under an RFP that better safeguards taxpayers' and riders' interests.

SECTION 2. Section 39-18-10 of the General Laws in Chapter 39-18 entitled "Rhode Island Public Transit Authority" is hereby amended to read as follows: 39-18-10. Trust funds.

(a) All moneys received pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, whether as proceeds from the sale of bonds or as revenues, shall be deemed to be trust funds to be held and applied solely as provided in this chapter. The authority may, in the resolution authorizing the bonds or in the trust agreement securing the bonds, provide for the payment of the proceeds of the sale of the bonds and the revenues to be received to a trustee, which shall be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust company within or without the state, which shall act as trustee of the bonds and hold and apply the bonds to the purposes of this chapter, subject to this chapter and to regulations as the resolution or trust agreement may provide, or may provide for the funds to be held in a separate account of the authority maintained at any bank within or without the state to be disbursed therefrom on the instructions of such officer or officers of the authority as may be so authorized and empowered by resolution of the authority.

(b) Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, no proceeds from trust funds subject to the provisions of subsection (a) of this section nor any appropriations provided by the state to the authority shall be used for any work performed after August 1, 2026, pursuant to the “transit center joint development project” request for proposals (RFP) issued in January, 2023 and/or pursuant to the preliminary services agreement executed in February, 2024 which covered a portion of the process contemplated in that RFP.

SECTION 3. This act shall take effect upon passage.