Skip to main content
H 7455Funding & Budget

Education - The Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act

This bill provides state funding to schools specifically to hire more mental health counselors, social workers, and behavioral support staff.

Held for study
Population
Affected
65
Introduced Jan 30, 2026Committee House Finance

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends the state's education funding laws to establish a new category of state financial support specifically for student mental and behavioral health. The bill mandates that the state provide funding equal to two percent of a school district's total expenditures to help hire and retain support staff, such as school social workers, counselors, psychologists, and behavioral specialists. To qualify for this funding, districts must currently be below specific industry-recommended staffing ratios. The funds are intended to expand services rather than replace existing funding, and the program will be overseen by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

For younger readers

This law helps schools get extra money to hire grownups who are trained to help kids with their feelings and behavior. These helpers include school counselors, social workers, and psychologists. If a school does not have enough of these helpers right now, the state will give them money to hire more. The goal is to make sure that if a student is feeling sad, upset, or having a hard time behaving, there is a professional there to talk to them, help them calm down, and support them so they can do well in school.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
StudentsSchool DistrictsSchool Counselors and Social WorkersTaxpayersParents
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
Amount unknown
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Directly addresses the mental health crisis among youth by providing dedicated funding for social workers, counselors, and psychologists in public schools.
  • Promotes a therapeutic rather than punitive approach to student behavior by funding de-escalation support and behavioral specialists.
  • Strengthens the social safety net within the education system by ensuring schools meet industry-recommended ratios for support staff, benefiting underserved students.
  • The funding is subject to proration if total approved costs exceed the appropriation, meaning the program may be underfunded relative to the actual need.
  • Eligibility is restricted to districts currently below industry ratios, potentially punishing districts that have already prioritized their budgets to provide adequate mental health staffing.
  • Does not remove or redirect existing funding for School Resource Officers (police in schools) found in the same section of the law, which many progressives view as part of the school-to-prison pipeline.
For Conservatives
  • Focuses on de-escalation and behavioral management, which could help maintain order and discipline in classrooms, allowing other students to learn without disruption.
  • Includes strict oversight provisions requiring the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to approve funds and ensure they are not used for activities the district is currently funding (anti-supplanting).
  • Bases funding eligibility on specific, measurable industry metrics (staffing ratios) rather than vague criteria.
  • Increases government spending by mandating a new funding stream equal to two percent of total district expenditures, which will ultimately fall on taxpayers.
  • Expands the size of the public sector workforce by subsidizing the hiring of more non-teaching school employees.
  • Reduces local control by incentivizing districts to adopt state-mandated staffing ratios and policies regarding student behavior management.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 23 additions · 2 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 16-7.2-6 of the General Laws in Chapter 16-7.2 entitled "The Education Equity and Property Tax Relief Act" is hereby amended to read as follows: 16-7.2-6. Categorical programs, state funded expenses. In addition to the foundation education aid provided pursuant to § 16-7.2-3, the permanent foundation education-aid program shall provide direct state funding for:

(a) Excess costs associated with special education students. Excess costs are defined when an individual special education student’s cost shall be deemed to be “extraordinary.” Extraordinary costs are those educational costs that exceed the state-approved threshold based on an amount above four times the core foundation amount (total of core instruction amount plus student success amount). The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding appropriated in any fiscal year; and the department of elementary and secondary education shall also collect data on those educational costs that exceed the state-approved threshold based on an amount above two (2), three (3), and five (5) times the core foundation amount;

(b) Career and technical education costs to help meet initial investment requirements needed to transform existing, or create new, comprehensive, career and technical education programs and career pathways in critical and emerging industries and to help offset the higher- than-average costs associated with facilities, equipment maintenance and repair, and supplies necessary for maintaining the quality of highly specialized programs that are a priority for the state. The department shall develop criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all career and technical education funds as may be determined by the general assembly on an annual basis. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(c) Programs to increase access to voluntary, free, high-quality pre-kindergarten programs. The department shall recommend criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all early childhood program funds as may be determined by the general assembly;

(d) Central Falls, Davies, and the Met Center Stabilization Fund is established to ensure that appropriate funding is available to support their students. Additional support for Central Falls is needed due to concerns regarding the city’s capacity to meet the local share of education costs. This fund requires that education aid calculated pursuant to § 16-7.2-3 and funding for costs outside the permanent foundation education-aid formula, including, but not limited to, transportation, facility maintenance, and retiree health benefits shall be shared between the state and the city of Central Falls. The fund shall be annually reviewed to determine the amount of the state and city appropriation. The state’s share of this fund may be supported through a reallocation of current state appropriations to the Central Falls school district. At the end of the transition period defined in § 16-7.2-7, the municipality will continue its contribution pursuant to § 16-7-24. Additional support for the Davies and the Met Center is needed due to the costs associated with running a stand-alone high school offering both academic and career and technical coursework. The department shall recommend criteria for the purpose of allocating any and all stabilization funds as may be determined by the general assembly;

(e) Excess costs associated with transporting students to out-of-district non-public schools. This fund will provide state funding for the costs associated with transporting students to out-of- district non-public schools, pursuant to chapter 21.1 of this title. The state will assume the costs of non-public out-of-district transportation for those districts participating in the statewide system. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(f) Excess costs associated with transporting students within regional school districts. This fund will provide direct state funding for the excess costs associated with transporting students within regional school districts, established pursuant to chapter 3 of this title. This fund requires that the state and regional school district share equally the student transportation costs net any federal sources of revenue for these expenditures. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible school districts if the total approved costs for which school districts are seeking reimbursement exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year;

(g) Public school districts that are regionalized shall be eligible for a regionalization bonus as set forth below:

(1) As used herein, the term “regionalized” shall be deemed to refer to a regional school district established under the provisions of chapter 3 of this title, including the Chariho Regional School district;

(2) For those districts that are regionalized as of July 1, 2010, the regionalization bonus shall commence in FY 2012. For those districts that regionalize after July 1, 2010, the regionalization bonus shall commence in the first fiscal year following the establishment of a regionalized school district as set forth in chapter 3 of this title, including the Chariho Regional School District;

(3) The regionalization bonus in the first fiscal year shall be two percent (2.0%) of the state’s share of the foundation education aid for the regionalized district as calculated pursuant to §§ 16-7.2-3 and 16-7.2-4 in that fiscal year;

(4) The regionalization bonus in the second fiscal year shall be one percent (1.0%) of the state’s share of the foundation education aid for the regionalized district as calculated pursuant to §§ 16-7.2-3 and 16-7.2-4 in that fiscal year;

(5) The regionalization bonus shall cease in the third fiscal year;

(6) The regionalization bonus for the Chariho regional school district shall be applied to the state share of the permanent foundation education aid for the member towns; and

(7) The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among those eligible regionalized school districts if the total, approved costs for which regionalized school districts are seeking a regionalization bonus exceed the amount of funding appropriated in any fiscal year;

(h) [Deleted by P.L. 2024, ch. 117, art. 8, § 1.]

(i) State support for school resource officers. For purposes of this subsection, a school resource officer (SRO) shall be defined as a career law enforcement officer with sworn authority who is deployed by an employing police department or agency in a community-oriented policing assignment to work in collaboration with one or more schools. School resource officers should have completed at least forty (40) hours of specialized training in school policing, administered by an accredited agency, before being assigned. Beginning in FY 2019, for a period of three (3) years, school districts or municipalities that choose to employ school resource officers shall receive direct state support for costs associated with employing such officers at public middle and high schools. Districts or municipalities shall be reimbursed an amount equal to one-half (½) of the cost of salaries and benefits for the qualifying positions. Funding will be provided for school resource officer positions established on or after July 1, 2018, provided that:

(1) Each school resource officer shall be assigned to one school:

(i) Schools with enrollments below one thousand two hundred (1,200) students shall require one school resource officer;

(ii) Schools with enrollments of one thousand two hundred (1,200) or more students shall require two school resource officers;

(2) School resource officers hired in excess of the requirement noted above shall not be eligible for reimbursement; and

(3) Schools that eliminate existing school resource officer positions and create new positions under this provision shall not be eligible for reimbursement; and

(j) Additional state support for districts to provide for the mental and behavioral health of students. The total additional amount to support the mental and behavioral health of students shall be equal to two percent (2%) of the district’s total expenditures. All categorical funds distributed pursuant to this subsection shall be used to hire and retain staff to provide high-quality, research- based services to students to support their mental and behavioral health. Such staff shall include school social workers, school counselors, school psychologists, paraprofessionals, behavioral specialists, and registered behavior techs (RBTs). To be eligible for such funding, districts shall:

(1) Be below the industry-recommended ratios of one school social worker per two hundred fifty (250) students, one school counselor per two hundred fifty (250) students, one school psychologist per five hundred (500) students, and/or have elementary classrooms without a full- time paraprofessional, behavior specialist, or RBT;

(2) Comply with all provisions of § 16-53.1-2; and

(3) Maintain policies, based on best practice, to ensure students removed from the classroom with escalated behavior receive de-escalation support before returning to the classroom. The department of elementary and secondary education shall collect performance reports from districts and approve the use of funds prior to expenditure. The department of elementary and secondary education shall ensure the funds are aligned to activities that are innovative and expansive and not utilized for activities the district is currently funding. The department of elementary and secondary education shall prorate the funds available for distribution among eligible recipients if the total calculated costs exceed the amount of funding available in any fiscal year; and (j)(k) Categorical programs defined in subsections (a) through (g) shall be funded pursuant to the transition plan in § 16-7.2-7.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.