Skip to main content
H 7448Property

Taxation - Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes

This bill limits property value assessment increases to no more than 20% during scheduled revaluations starting in December 2026.

Held for study
Population
Affected
72
Introduced Jan 30, 2026Committee House Municipal Government & Housing

Plain-English Summary

This legislation amends Rhode Island's laws regarding local property tax assessments. The key change introduced by this bill is a cap on how much a property's assessed value can increase during scheduled revaluations. Specifically, starting December 31, 2026, and for every annual assessment date thereafter, any property revaluation performed by a city or town cannot exceed the previous revaluation by more than twenty percent (20%). This measure aims to prevent sudden, drastic spikes in property tax assessments for homeowners and property owners during the state-mandated revaluation cycles.

For younger readers

In every town, the government decides how much a house or building is worth to figure out how much tax the owner must pay. Sometimes, prices go up very fast, which makes taxes go up very fast. This new rule says that starting in the year 2026, when the town checks the value of a building, they cannot say the value went up by more than 20 percent since the last time they checked. This helps keep tax bills from getting too high all of a sudden.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
HomeownersCommercial Property OwnersMunicipal GovernmentsTax AssessorsPublic School Districts
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

Moderate risk

Low to Moderate Risk. While capping assessments is a policy choice often within legislative power, it creates a risk regarding the uniformity clause of taxation. If the cap causes properties of equal market value to be taxed at significantly different levels over time, it could be challenged as inequitable or arbitrary. However, similar mechanisms (like California's Prop 13) have generally withstood federal constitutional challenges, though state-level uniformity requirements vary.

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Protects low-income and fixed-income homeowners from sudden, drastic spikes in property taxes caused by rapid gentrification, helping to prevent displacement in changing neighborhoods.
  • Provides financial stability for working-class families by making housing costs more predictable, ensuring they are not surprised by unmanageable tax bills due to market volatility.
  • Reduces the immediate burden on small local businesses that own their property, allowing them to survive market fluctuations without being priced out of their communities.
  • Disproportionately benefits wealthy property owners whose high-value real estate often appreciates the fastest, effectively shielding the rich from paying their fair share of taxes based on true market value.
  • Significantly reduces the potential revenue base for municipalities, which could lead to budget cuts for essential public services like schools, libraries, and social safety nets.
  • Creates an inequitable system where newer homebuyers may pay taxes on full market value while long-term owners pay on suppressed values, discouraging housing mobility and fairness.
For Conservatives
  • Protects property owners from government overreach and excessive taxation by strictly limiting the state's ability to capitalize on inflation and rising market values.
  • Provides certainty and predictability for businesses and homeowners, allowing for better long-term financial planning without the threat of predatory tax hikes.
  • Forces local governments to be more fiscally disciplined and operate within a constrained budget rather than relying on soaring property assessments to fund expanded spending.
  • Interferes with the free market by creating artificial valuations that do not reflect the true economic worth of assets, effectively distorting real estate data.
  • May necessitate an increase in tax rates (mill rates) to compensate for the artificially capped valuations, potentially resulting in higher visible tax rates that are politically damaging.
  • Violates the principle of equal treatment under the law by creating different tax burdens for similar properties based solely on the timing of assessment caps rather than actual value.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 4 additions

SECTION 1. Section 44-5-11.6 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-5 entitled "Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes" is hereby amended to read as follows: 44-5-11.6. Assessment of valuations — Apportionment of levies.

(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 44-5-11 [repealed], beginning on December 31, 2000, the assessors in the several towns and cities shall conduct an update as defined in this section or shall assess all valuations and apportion the levy of all taxes legally ordered under the rules and regulations, not repugnant to law, as the town meetings and city councils, respectively, shall, from time to time, prescribe; provided, that the update or valuation is performed in accordance with the following schedules: (1)(i) For a transition period, for cities and towns that conducted or implemented a revaluation as of 1993 or in years later: Update Revaluation Lincoln 2000 2003 South Kingstown 2000 2003 Smithfield 2000 2003 West Warwick 2000 2003 Johnston 2000 2003 Burrillville 2000 2003 North Smithfield 2000 2003 Central Falls 2000 2003 North Kingstown 2000 2003 Jamestown 2000 2003 North Providence 2001 2004 Cumberland 2001 2004 Bristol 2004 2001 Charlestown 2001 2004 East Greenwich 2002 2005 Cranston 2002 2005 Barrington 2002 2005 Warwick 2003 2006 Warren 2003 2006 East Providence 2003 2006

(ii) Provided that the reevaluation period for the town of New Shoreham shall be extended to 2003 and the update for the town of Hopkinton may be extended to 2007 with no additional reimbursements by the state relating to the delay.

(iii) The implementation date for this schedule is December 31, of the stated year.

(iv) Those cities and towns not listed in this schedule shall continue the revaluation schedule pursuant to § 44-5-11 [repealed]. (2)(i) For the post-transition period and in years thereafter: Update #1 Update #2 Revaluation Woonsocket 2002 2005 2008 Pawtucket 2002 2005 2008 Portsmouth 2001 2004 2007 Coventry 2001 2004 2007 Providence 2003 2006 2009 Foster 2002 2005 2008 Middletown 2002 2005 2008 Little Compton 2003 2006 2009 Scituate 2003 2006 2009 Westerly 2003 2006 2009 West Greenwich 2004 2007 2010 Glocester 2004 2007 2010 Richmond 2004 2007 2010 Bristol 2004 2007 2010 Tiverton 2005 2008 2011 Newport 2005 2008 2011 New Shoreham 2006 2009 2012 Narragansett 2005 2008 2011 Exeter 2005 2008 2011 Hopkinton 2007 2010 2013 Lincoln 2006 2009 2012 South Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 West Warwick 2006 2009 2012 Johnston 2006 2009 2012 Burrillville 2006 2009 2012 North Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 Central Falls 2006 2009 2012 North Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 Jamestown 2006 2009 2012 North Providence 2007 2010 2013 Cumberland 2007 2010 2013 Charlestown 2007 2010 2013 East Greenwich 2008 2011 2014 Cranston 2008 2011 2014 Barrington 2008 2010 2014 Warwick 2009 2012 2015 Warren 2009 2012 2016 East Providence 2009 2012 2015

(ii) The implementation date for the schedule is December 31 of the stated year. Upon the completion of the update and revaluation according to this schedule, each city and town shall conduct a revaluation within nine (9) years of the date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct an update of real property every three (3) years from the last revaluation. Provided, that for the town of Bristol, the time for the first statistical update following the 2010 revaluation shall be extended from 2013 to 2014 and said statistical update shall be based on valuations as of December 31, 2014, and the first revaluation following the December 31, 2014, and 2015 statistical revaluation shall be extended from 2016 to 2019 and said revaluation shall be based on valuations as of December 31, 2018; and, that for the city of Woonsocket, the time of the first statistical update following the 2017 revaluation shall be extended from 2020 to 2021, and the statistical update shall be based on the valuations as of December 31, 2021; and, that for the city of Warwick, the time for the second statistical update following the 2015 revaluation shall be extended from 2021 to 2022 and said statistical update shall be based on valuations as of December 31, 2022; and, that for the town of Johnston, the time of the revaluation following the 2012 revaluation shall be extended from 2022 to 2023, and the statistical update shall be based on the valuations as of December 31, 2022; and, that for the town of West Greenwich, the time for a first statistical update following the 2019 revaluation shall be extended from 2022 to 2023 and said statistical update shall be based on valuations as of December 31, 2023; and, that for the town of New Shoreham, the full evaluation nine (9) years following the 2012 revaluation based on the valuations of December 31, 2021, shall be extended to December 31, 2022, and be based on valuations as of December 31, 2022. Provided that for the city of East Providence, the revaluation period as of the December 31, 2021, assessment date shall be extended to the December 31, 2022, assessment date, with no additional reimbursements by the state relating to the delay. Provided, that for the city of Woonsocket, the time of the second statistical update following the 2017 revaluation shall be extended from 2023 to 2024, and the statistical update shall be based on the valuations as of December 31, 2024; and provided, further, that for the city of Woonsocket, the full revaluation nine (9) years following the 2017 revaluation based on the valuations of December 31, 2026, shall be extended to December 31, 2027, and be based on valuations as of December 31, 2027, and the first statistical update shall be based upon the valuations as of December 31, 2030, and the second statistical update shall be based upon the valuations as of December 31, 2033.

(iii) Cities and towns shall not change the assessment of any property based on the purchase price of the property after a transfer occurs except in accordance with a townwide or citywide revaluation or update schedule; provided that, this prohibition shall not apply to completed new real estate construction.

(iv) Commencing December 31, 2026, and every December 31 thereafter, all revaluations performed shall not increase more than twenty percent (20%) from the last previous revaluation performed in accordance with this section.

(b) No later than February 1, 1998, the director of the department of revenue shall promulgate rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of this section to define the requirements for the updates that shall include, but not be limited to:

(1) An analysis of sales;

(2) A rebuilding of land value tables;

(3) A rebuilding of cost tables of all improvement items; and

(4) A rebuilding of depreciation schedules. Upon completion of an update, each city or town shall provide for a hearing and/or appeal process for any aggrieved person to address any issue that arose during the update.

(c) The costs incurred by the towns and cities for the first update shall be borne by the state in an amount not to exceed twenty dollars ($20.00) per parcel. The costs incurred by the towns and cities for the second update shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state (in an amount not to exceed sixteen dollars ($16.00) per parcel) and twenty percent (20%) by the town or city, and in the third update and thereafter, the state shall pay sixty percent (60%) of the update (not to exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per parcel) and the town or city shall pay forty percent (40%); provided, that for the second update and in all updates thereafter, that the costs incurred by any city or town that is determined to be a distressed community pursuant to § 45-13-12 shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state and twenty percent (20%) by the city or town for all updates required by this section.

(d) The office of municipal affairs, after consultation with the League of Cities and Towns and the Rhode Island Assessors’ Association, shall recommend adjustments to the costs formula described in subsection (c) of this section based upon existing market conditions.

(e) Any property that is either exempt from the local property tax pursuant to § 44-3-3 or pays a city or town an amount in lieu of taxes is not required to have its values updated pursuant to this section and the property is not eligible for the reimbursement provisions of subsection (c) of this section. However, those properties that are exempt from taxation and are eligible for state appropriations in lieu of property tax under the provisions of § 45-13-5.1 are eligible for state reimbursement pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, provided, that these properties were revalued as part of that city or town’s most recent property revaluation.

(f) No city or town is required to conduct an update pursuant to this section unless the state has appropriated sufficient funds to cover the state’s costs as identified in subsection (c) of this section.

(g) Any city or town that fails to conduct an update or revaluation as required by this section, or requests and receives an extension of the dates specified in this section, shall receive the same amount of state aid under §§ 45-13-1, 45-13-5.1, and 45-13-12 in the budget year for which the new values were to apply as the city or town received in state aid in the previous budget year; provided, however, if the new year’s entitlement is lower than the prior year’s entitlement, the lower amount applies, except for the town of New Shoreham for the fiscal year 2003.

(h) Any bill or resolution to extend the dates for a city or town to conduct an update or revaluation must be approved by a two-thirds (⅔) majority of both houses of the general assembly.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.