Skip to main content
H 7424Licensing & Accreditation

Businesses and Professions - Collaborative Pharmacy Practice

This bill allows pharmacists to collaborate with more healthcare providers and perform a wider range of medical tests without committee approval.

Signed into law65 Yea0 Nay10 Not voting
Population
Affected
35
Introduced Jan 30, 2026Committee House Health & Human Services

Plain-English Summary

This legislation updates the regulations governing "collaborative pharmacy practice" in Rhode Island. It broadens the scope of collaboration by replacing the term "physician" with "provider," allowing pharmacists to enter into agreements with a wider range of healthcare professionals. The bill eliminates the "Collaborative Practice Committee" and removes the requirement for an approval process before these agreements can take effect. Additionally, it expands the definition of "limited-function tests" that pharmacists can perform to include all tests waived under federal CLIA standards, rather than a restricted list of specific tests.

For younger readers

This law changes the rules for pharmacists, who are the people who give you your medicine. Before, pharmacists could only make special plans to help sick people if they worked specifically with a doctor. Now, they can work with other health experts too. The law also lets pharmacists do more simple health tests, like checking blood, without having to ask for special permission first. This means pharmacists can help people faster and do more things to keep people healthy without waiting for a group of people to say it is okay.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups
PharmacistsPhysicians and Nurse PractitionersPatients requiring drug therapy managementPharmacy OwnersMedical Laboratory Technicians
Impacted communities
All

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost
None
Estimated revenue
None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints
For Progressives
  • Increases access to essential healthcare services for underserved and rural populations by allowing pharmacists to partner with a broader range of providers, such as nurse practitioners.
  • Expands the types of diagnostic tests pharmacists can perform, making healthcare more convenient and potentially reducing the burden on overcrowded clinics and emergency rooms.
  • Removes unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles by eliminating the Collaborative Practice Committee, allowing healthcare professionals to coordinate patient care more efficiently.
  • Eliminates the Collaborative Practice Committee, removing a layer of oversight that ensured a balance of power between medical doctors and pharmacists regarding patient safety standards.
  • Allows individual providers to approve educational training for pharmacists, potentially leading to inconsistent standards of care compared to state-regulated training requirements.
  • Could incentivize large corporate pharmacy chains to push pharmacists to perform more clinical tasks without increasing staffing, leading to worker burnout and potential errors.
For Conservatives
  • Reduces government bureaucracy and red tape by eliminating the state-appointed Collaborative Practice Committee and the requirement for government approval of practice agreements.
  • Promotes free-market efficiency by allowing private providers and pharmacists to define their own training requirements and agreements without state interference.
  • Expands the scope of practice for pharmacists, potentially increasing competition in the healthcare market and lowering costs for consumers seeking basic tests.
  • Dilutes the traditional authority of physicians by replacing the specific term "physician" with the broader "provider," potentially undermining the medical hierarchy.
  • Removes the requirement that limited-function tests be FDA-approved for over-the-counter sale, potentially loosening safety standards for diagnostics performed outside a doctor's office.
  • Eliminates a committee that included Medical Society nominees, thereby removing a check on the expansion of pharmacy practice that some might view as encroaching on medical practice.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 33 additions · 32 deletions

SECTION 1. Sections 5-19.2-2 and 5-19.2-5 of the General Laws in Chapter 5-19.2 entitled "Collaborative Pharmacy Practice" are hereby amended to read as follows: 5-19.2-2. Definitions. When used in this chapter, the following words and phrases are construed as follows: (a)(1) “Collaborative pharmacy practice” is that means the practice of pharmacy whereby one or more licensed pharmacist(s), with advanced training and experience relevant to the scope of collaborative practice, agrees to work in collaboration with one or more physicians providers for the purpose of drug therapy management of patients, such management to be pursuant to a protocol or protocols written agreement authorized by the physician(s) provider(s) and subject to conditions and limitations as set forth by the department. A healthcare professional who has prescribing privileges and is employed with or by a collaborating physician provider may be in such an agreement. (b)(2) “Collaborative practice agreement” is means a written and signed agreement, entered into voluntarily, between one or more licensed pharmacist(s), with advanced training and experience relevant to the scope of collaborative practice, and one or more physicians referring providers that defines the collaborative pharmacy practice in which the pharmacist(s) and physician(s) provider(s) who are parties to the agreement propose to engage. Collaborative practice agreements shall be made in the best interest of public health, follow clinical guidelines and standards of care, and be agreed upon guidance with the collaborating provider. No approval or denial process shall be required, and parties to the collaborative practice agreement may begin acting pursuant to the agreement when all required documentation is complete. It shall be the responsibility of the parties to the collaborative practice agreement to respond to the board’s inquiries and clarify all issues pertinent to the collaborative practice agreement. Collaborative practice agreements shall be reviewed and signed by the parties thereto annually.

(c) “Collaborative practice committee” shall consist of six (6) individuals: three (3) individuals to be appointed by the board of pharmacy from nominees provided by the Rhode Island Pharmacists Association and three (3) individuals to be appointed by the board of medical licensure and discipline from nominees provided by the Rhode Island Medical Society. The collaborative practice committee shall advise the director on all issues pertinent to the regulation of collaborative practice agreements. (d)(3) “Drug therapy management” means the review, in accordance with a collaborative practice agreement, of drug therapy regimen or regimens of patients by one or more licensed pharmacist(s) for the purpose of initiating, adjusting, monitoring, or discontinuing the regimen. Decisions involving drug therapy management shall be made in the best interests of the patient. In accordance with a collaborative practice agreement, drug therapy management may include: (1)(i) Initiating, adjusting, monitoring, or discontinuing drug therapy; (2)(ii) Collecting and reviewing patient histories; (3)(iii) Obtaining and checking vital signs, including pulse, height, weight, temperature, blood pressure, and respiration, or other clinical information as appropriate or necessary to provide care; and (4)(iv) Under the supervision of, or in direct consultation with, one or more physician(s), ordering and evaluating the results of laboratory tests directly related to drug therapy when performed in accordance with approved protocols applicable to the practice setting and providing such evaluation does not include any diagnostic component. (e)(4) “Limited-function test” means those tests listed in the federal register under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) as waived tests. For the purposes of this chapter, limited-function test shall include only the following: blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol tests, and/or other tests that are classified as waived under CLIA and are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale to the public without a prescription in the form of an over-the-counter test kit. (f)(5) “Pharmacist with advanced training and experience relevant to the scope of collaborative practice” means a licensed pharmacist in this state with a bachelor of science in pharmacy and postgraduate educational training or a doctor of pharmacy degree. Such training shall include, but not be limited to, residency training; board certification; certification from an accredited professional organization educational institution; or any other continuing education provider approved by the director of health collaborating provider relevant to the proposed scope of the collaborative practice agreement. (g)(6) “Practice of pharmacy” means the interpretation, evaluation, and implementation of medical orders, including the performance of clinical laboratory tests, provided such testing is limited to limited-function tests as defined herein; the dispensing of prescription drug orders; participation in drug and device selection; drug regimen reviews and drug or drug-related research; provision of patient counseling and the provision of those acts or services necessary to provide pharmaceutical care; drug therapy management pursuant to a collaborative practice agreement; and the responsibility for the supervision for compounding and labeling of drugs and devices (except labeling by a manufacturer, repackager, or distributor of nonprescription drugs and commercially packaged legend drugs and devices); proper and safe storage of drugs and devices; and maintenance of proper records for them. 5-19.2-5. Immunity. The director of health, board members, the collaborative practice committee, and their agents and employees shall be immune from suit in any action, civil or criminal, based on any disciplinary proceeding or other official act performed in good faith in the course of their duties under this chapter. There shall be no civil liability on the part of, or cause of action of any nature against, the board, director, their agents or their employees or against any organization or its members, peer-review board or its members, or other witnesses and parties to board proceedings for any statements made in good faith by them in any reports, communications, or testimony concerning an investigation by the board of the conduct or competence of any licensee under this chapter.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect on July 1, 2026.