H 7271Education

Education - Cooperative Service Among School Districts

Updates the Urban Collaborative's board structure and prevents the state from cutting Providence's participation or funding without local board approval.

Held for study

Population
Affected

Email Legislator

Introduced Jan 23, 2026Committee House Education

Plain-English Summary

This bill modifies the governance and funding structure of the "urban collaborative," an educational partnership involving Providence, Pawtucket, East Providence, and Central Falls. It changes the composition of the collaborative's board to include representation based on the number of students each district sends. Significantly, the bill limits the state's power during the state intervention in Providence schools; it prevents the state from removing Providence from the collaborative or reducing funding below 2025 levels without the approval of the local Providence School Board. It also allows Providence students to apply directly to the collaborative if denied by the district.

For younger readers

This bill changes the rules for a group of schools called the Urban Collaborative, which helps students from cities like Providence and Pawtucket who need extra help or a different way of learning. It changes how the leaders of this group are chosen, giving more votes to districts that have more students there. It also makes sure that the state government cannot stop Providence from being part of this group or cut its money for these schools without asking the local school board first. It allows students to sign up directly if their main school says no.

Who & Where It Applies

Impacted groups

Students in alternative education programsProvidence School BoardSchool Committees of member districtsRI Department of Elementary and Secondary EducationTaxpayers in member cities

Impacted communities

Providence, Pawtucket, East Providence, Central Falls

Constitutional & Fiscal Check

None Likely

Estimated cost

Amount unknown

Estimated revenue

None

Bill Analysis

Both viewpoints

For Progressives

Restores democratic oversight by requiring approval from the local Providence School Board for major decisions regarding the collaborative, pushing back against unilateral state control during the intervention.
Protects vulnerable students by ensuring that those denied placement by the district administration can apply directly to the collaborative for alternative education services.
Safeguards educational resources by establishing a funding floor, preventing the state or district administration from cutting the budget for alternative education programs below 2025 levels.
The new board structure, which awards seats based on student volume, creates a "pay-to-play" power dynamic that may allow larger districts to dominate the decision-making process over smaller communities like Central Falls.
Allowing students to bypass district administration and apply directly could fragment support services, potentially disconnecting students from other necessary district-provided social safety nets or IEP coordination.
Locking in funding levels based on a specific fiscal year could be fiscally rigid, potentially diverting funds from other equally important social services or educational programs if enrollment in the collaborative drops naturally.

For Conservatives

Increases school choice by allowing students to bypass district bureaucracy and apply directly to the Urban Collaborative for educational services.
Checks the power of the unelected state bureaucracy (RIDE) by returning specific decision-making powers to the local level regarding participation in the collaborative.
Clarifies that federal aid and state education funding must follow the student to the collaborative, promoting the principle that money should be attached to the child rather than the institution.
Undermines the authority of the state intervention in Providence schools, potentially hampering efforts to turn around the failing district by allowing the local board to block operational changes.
Imposes a fiscal mandate that locks in spending at 2025 levels regardless of economic conditions, preventing future administrators from implementing necessary budget cuts or efficiency measures.
Expands government bureaucracy by increasing the size of the collaborative's board based on student population, potentially making the body less efficient and more costly to manage.

Votes

Loading votes...

Full Bill Text

Changes to existing Rhode Island law · 33 additions · 2 deletions

SECTION 1. Section 16-3.1-11 of the General Laws in Chapter 16-3.1 entitled "Cooperative Service Among School Districts [See Title 16 Chapter 97 — The Rhode Island Board of Education Act]" is hereby amended to read as follows: 16-3.1-11. Urban collaborative.

(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any general or special law to the contrary, the school committees of the cities of Providence, Pawtucket, East Providence, Central Falls and other Rhode Island school districts as may be approved for inclusion by existing member districts in accordance with collaborative bylaws are authorized and empowered to continue and/or initiate cooperative efforts to provide alternate education programs and/or diagnostic services required by law or regulation for students achieving limited success in traditional settings and to do all things necessary including, but not limited to utilization of technology, including television, all on a collaborative basis.

(b) The various school committees may assign and delegate to ~~their respective school~~ ~~committee chairs or designee or superintendents of schools or designee, acting as a regional~~ the urban collaborative board any duties, responsibilities, and powers that the committees may deem necessary for the conduct, administration, and management of the urban collaborative. The school committee of each member district shall appoint one board member plus one additional board member for every thirty (30) students attending the urban collaborative from the member district. Whenever a vacancy arises on the urban collaborative board, the urban collaborative board may provide a list of suggested candidates to the school committee of the member district filling the vacancy. Although these suggestions shall be non-binding, and the school committee may select a board member who is not on the list of suggested candidates, the school committee shall give due consideration to the list of suggested candidates the urban collaborative board may provide. (c)(1) Beginning on July 1, 2013 the urban collaborative shall be funded pursuant to the provisions of § 16-7.2-3. The state share of the permanent foundation education aid shall be paid directly to the urban collaborative pursuant to the provisions of § 16-7.2-7. The local school district shall transfer the difference between the calculated state share of the permanent foundation education aid and the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of § 16-7.2-7 to the urban collaborative, until the transition of the state share is complete. In addition, the local school district shall pay the local share of education funding to the urban collaborative as outlined in § 16-7.2-5.

(2) The urban collaborative shall be eligible to receive other aids, grants, Medicaid revenue, and any other revenue according to Rhode Island law, as though it were a school district. Federal aid received by the state shall be used to benefit students in the urban collaborative, if the school qualifies for the aid, as though it were a school district.

(d) Nothing in chapter 7.1 of title 16 shall be construed to authorize the department of elementary and secondary education to exercise control over the powers of a school committee pursuant to this section. During the duration of the intervention and support for the Providence public school district pursuant to § 16-7.1-5 including, but not limited to, the assumption of control over budget, program, and/or personnel of individual schools within the Providence public school district:

(1) No decision to terminate Providence’s participation in the urban collaborative shall be valid without the approval of the Providence school board. Any such decisions made prior to the effective date of this subsection shall be null and void until approved by the Providence school board.

(2) No decision to withdraw Providence students from the urban collaborative without their consent shall be valid without the approval of the Providence school board.

(3) Any student of the Providence public schools who has been denied matriculation in the urban collaborative by the Providence public school district may apply directly to the urban collaborative for matriculation in the urban collaborative.

(4) The Providence public schools shall not reduce either per pupil or total funding to the urban collaborative below the fiscal year 2025 level, increased by the same percentage as the state total of school aid is increased.

SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage.